Skip to main content

VA Disability Benefits: Board of Veterans' Appeals Has Made Improvements in Quality Assurance, but Challenges Remain for VA in Assuring Consistency

GAO-05-655T Published: May 05, 2005. Publicly Released: May 05, 2005.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

The House Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs asked GAO to update a 2002 study to determine what VA has done to (1) correct reported weaknesses in methods used by the Board to select decisions for quality review and calculate the accuracy rates reported by the Board and (2) address the potential for inconsistency in decision-making at all levels of adjudication in VA, including VA's 57 regional offices and the Board. GAO said in 2002 that VA had not studied consistency even though adjudicator judgment is inherently required in the decision-making process, and state-to-state variations in the average disability compensation payment per veteran raised questions about consistency. In January 2003, in part because of concerns about consistency, GAO designated VA's disability program as high-risk.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Appeals processDecision makingInternal controlsQuality assuranceQuality controlQuality improvementRisk managementVeteransVeterans benefitsVeterans disability compensation