Skip to main content

National Defense Stockpile: Comments on DOD's 1992 Report to the Congress and Proposed Legislation

T-NSIAD-92-17 Published: May 21, 1992. Publicly Released: May 21, 1992.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed the Department of Defense's (DOD) estimates and requirements for the national defense stockpile. GAO noted that DOD: (1) bases its stockpile requirements on assumptions about war scenarios, military force structure, domestic production of strategic and critical materials, and availability of materials from foreign sources; (2) believes that recent world events necessitate reevaluation of its last threat assessment, which could lead to further reductions in stockpile goals; (3) uses the Department of State's reliability assessments of foreign suppliers, which may not provide an adequate and reliable basis for determining stockpile requirements; (4) uses outdated data and does not adequately account for uncertainty in its use of material consumption ratios for determining stockpile requirements; (5) should cautiously proceed with stockpile disposal plans, due to the estimation uncertainties; (6) reasonably proposed downsizing or eliminating requirements for some materials, although some industries and foreign countries expressed concerns about disposal plans; (7) has not consulted with other federal agencies in determining its 5-year disposal alternative plans, and generally involves other federal agencies in stockpile issues on an informal, ad hoc basis; (8) has significant excesses of ferroalloy materials it is legislatively required to procure, but without defense industry, domestic producers may not be able to compete with foreign producers; and (9) has made limited progress in addressing previous GAO recommendations regarding stockpile requirements.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Defense capabilitiesDefense contingency planningDefense industryEmergency preparednessIndustrial mobilizationInteragency relationsInternational relationsMilitary inventoriesRaw materialsSecurity threatsStrategic materials