Skip to main content

Federal Downsizing: The Administration's Management of Workforce Reductions

T-GGD-95-108 Published: Mar 02, 1995. Publicly Released: Mar 02, 1995.
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed the status of workforce reductions mandated by the Federal Workforce Restructuring Act of 1994, focusing on: (1) the Administration's compliance with the act; (2) the targets of workforce downsizing; and (3) how workforce reductions are being managed. GAO noted that: (1) the act requires the federal government to reduce its workforce by 272,900 full-time equivalent (FTE) positions between 1993 and 1999; (2) the act allows non-defense agencies to pay buyouts to employees who agree to resign, retire, or take voluntary early retirement by March 31, 1995; (3) the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) conducts quarterly reviews of agency FTE usage to determine if agencies are likely to meet their fiscal year FTE targets; (4) the Administration anticipates falling below the annual mandated FTE ceiling through fiscal year (FY) 1996; (5) although some savings are expected from large workforce reductions, agencies use these savings to meet their overall discretionary spending caps; (6) if some work is contracted out to private companies as a result of workforce reductions, the contracting costs would reduce any net savings from those reductions; (7) although 34,000 FTE positions are to be eliminated from the Department of Defense in FY 1995, some agencies are expected to increase in size during this period of downsizing; (8) both OMB and the Office of Personnel Management have provided guidance to agencies on how to achieve workforce reductions; and (9) additional reductions in force may be necessary at some agencies as a result of the National Performance Review.

Full Report

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Civilian employeesEmployee buyoutsEmployee incentivesEmployee retirement plansFederal downsizingLabor forceJob classificationPersonnel managementPresidential budgetsReductions in force