Skip to main content

Cost Effectiveness of Life-Cycle Process in Buying Transit Vehicles Questionable

RCED-83-184 Published: Sep 01, 1983. Publicly Released: Sep 01, 1983.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed the Urban Mass Transportation Administration's (UMTA) procedure that requires federally funded transit systems to use life-cycle costs when buying transit vehicles.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Transportation The Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, UMTA, to develop research and demonstration projects with selected transit systems to document the costs associated with using the life-cycle cost process to buy transit vehicles.
Closed – Implemented
In December 1984, the Department of Transportation (DOT) issued a report analyzing the experiences of 25 transit systems that used life-cycle costs when purchasing buses. The report contains conclusions about the purchases and changes that would improve the process.
Department of Transportation The Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, UMTA, to develop research and demonstration projects with selected transit systems to keep operating and maintenance cost records for the vehicles bought to determine the validity of the cost projections used in making the contract award.
Closed – Implemented
DOT has initiated a project to collect maintenance and operating cost records for 30 articulated buses. The project is expected to be completed in February 1988. The report concluded that the status of development of transit operating databases is inadequate to support widespread use of life-cycle costing.
Department of Transportation The Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, UMTA, to develop research and demonstration projects with selected transit systems to identify ways to overcome the obstacles to using the life-cycle cost procurement process by addressing the problems of the availability of adequate data, selection of verifiable cost factors, failure to consider the present value of the projected costs, development of fair evaluation processes, and expertise needed to adequately evaluate cost projections.
Closed – Not Implemented
UMTA was not able to develop projects which would identify ways to overcome the obstacles to using the life-cycle cost procurement process.

Full Report

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Cost effectiveness analysisFederal fundsLife cycle costsMass transitMotor vehiclesProcurement policyProjectionsProcurementMaintenance costsRolling stock