Military Training: Cost-Effective Development of Simulations Presents Significant Challenges
NSIAD-96-44
Published: Nov 08, 1995. Publicly Released: Nov 08, 1995.
Skip to Highlights
Highlights
GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) development of the Joint Simulation System (JSIMS), focusing on whether DOD: (1) is progressing with its development of JSIMS; and (2) decisions to improve the Aggregate Level Simulation Protocol (ALSP) Confederation are cost-effective.
Recommendations
Recommendations for Executive Action
Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
---|---|---|
Department of Defense | To help ensure the total development of JSIMS, the Secretary of Defense should establish a joint funding line for the core development of JSIMS and direct the Secretaries of the Army, the Navy, and the Air Force to establish funding lines for their respective executive agency JSIMS responsibilities regarding warfare function development. |
DOD did not agree that each agency needed to develop a separate funding line. As of September 8, 1997, DOD had not taken any action on this recommendation.
|
Department of Defense | The Secretary of Defense should require the Under Secretary for Acquisition and Technology to assume a stronger management role to resolve simulation issues by defining JSIMS and developing a definitive plan of action. |
DOD agreed with the recommendation and indicated its intent to develop an action plan. However, as of September 8, 1997, no action had been initiated.
|
Department of Defense | The Secretary of Defense should require the Under Secretary for Acquisition and Technology to assume a stronger management role to resolve simulation issues by developing a transition strategy to phase out the ALSP and phase in JSIMS. This strategy should be based upon cost estimates associated with modifying, expanding, and testing the ALSP Confederation to decide which improvements to the ALSP Confederation provide benefits that are cost-effective. |
DOD has not initiated action.
|
Full Report
Public Inquiries
Topics
Combat readinessComputer assisted instructionComputer network protocolsCost effectiveness analysisDefense contingency planningDefense cost controlElectronic warfareMilitary trainingSystems conversionsMilitary readiness