Attack Submarines: Alternatives for a More Affordable SSN Force Structure
NSIAD-95-16
Published: Oct 13, 1994. Publicly Released: Nov 14, 1994.
Skip to Highlights
Highlights
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed: (1) the Navy's strategy for maintaining its nuclear-powered attack submarine (SSN) force structure; and (2) less costly alternatives for maintaining the SSN force.
Recommendations
Matter for Congressional Consideration
| Matter | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Congress should consider these analyses of less costly alternatives as it deliberates SSN force structure and acquisition issues. |
Closed – Not Implemented
|
Congress has not debated submarine force structure in this session. Debate on funding a third Seawolf submarine included references to information contained in the report and in later GAO testimony. |
Full Report
Office of Public Affairs
Topics
Antisubmarine warfareCombat readinessDefense contingency planningFuture budget projectionsMilitary budgetsMilitary cost controlNaval procurementNaval warfareNuclear powered submarinesShipbuilding industry