Skip to main content

Naval Aviation

NSIAD-93-287R Published: Sep 01, 1993. Publicly Released: Sep 01, 1993.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO compared the costs and capabilities of the F/A-18E/F with the F-14D aircraft. GAO found that: (1) Navy cost and technical comparisons have determined that the F/A-18E/F would be technically superior and cheaper than the F-14D aircraft on a life-cycle basis; (2) although F-14D development and production costs are slightly lower, its operational and support costs would be significantly higher than F/A-18E/F operational costs; (3) although the Navy's cost comparison may have unfairly favored the F/A-18E/F because it used different production, attrition, and replacement rates, the F/A-18E/F remains the most cost-effective aircraft; and (4) the Navy's technical comparisons have correctly identified the F/A-18E/F aircraft's superiority because it can be equipped with advanced weapons and navigational aids, has a longer mission range, would be more reliable, would be less vulnerable to ground fire, and would require less support personnel.

Full Report

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Weapons systemsAir defense systemsComparative analysisCost effectiveness analysisDefense capabilitiesLife cycle costsNaval aircraftNaval aviationNaval procurementMilitary forces