Skip to main content

Enlisted Force Management: Past Practices and Future Challenges

NSIAD-91-48 Published: Jan 22, 1991. Publicly Released: Jan 22, 1991.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO reviewed the Department of Defense's (DOD) management of enlisted forces, focusing on how the Army and Air Force: (1) managed the size and composition of their enlisted forces; (2) planned for enlisted force reductions; and (3) complied with enlisted force management requirements.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Defense To improve the management of enlisted personnel, the Secretary of Defense should require the use of the objective force as a more stable, long-term target.
Closed – Implemented
DOD does not plan to revise its directives until the drawdown is complete, which is estimated at 1-2 years from now.
Department of Defense To improve the management of enlisted personnel, the Secretary of Defense should require the services to manage their enlisted personnel more closely to the program objective force target, particularly with regard to the career force, and provide written justification when deviations are necessary.
Closed – Implemented
DOD requires the services to include in their annual enlisted force plans any deviations from the previous plans.
Department of Defense To improve the management of enlisted personnel, the Secretary of Defense should develop guidance on how to determine the level of seniority needed.
Closed – Implemented
The drawdown policy objectives and controls of January 16, 1991 require the services to prepare plans that specifically establish the accession level, the percent years of service 1-6 level, the percent years of service 7-20 level, and the percent years of service 20+ level to sustain requirements with the established fiscal year 1995 end strength.

Full Report

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Air Force personnelArmy personnelBudget cutsCareer planningDefense cost controlEnlisted personnelMilitary downsizingMilitary promotionsPersonnel managementReductions in force