Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO evaluated the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) computer systems capability to minimize the possibility of near mid-air collisions, focusing on: (1) how FAA managed computer capacity in existing terminal systems; and (2) whether FAA assessed capacity limitation in terminal systems that could preclude effective implementation of planned safety enhancements intended to reduce near mid-air collisions.
Recommendations for Executive Action
|Department of Transportation||1. To address existing shortfalls that currently threaten the ability of controllers to maintain separation of aircraft, the Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, FAA, to take necessary actions to ensure that critical air traffic control functions are not interrupted by capacity shortfalls. Initially, this involves gathering and reporting important capacity-related data, identifying quickly those TRACON that have the most urgent problems and, in concert with TRACON officials, identifying potential solutions to the problems. Identification of potential solutions should include considering those temporary measures that have been successfully used at selected TRACON, as well as other approaches to reduce work loads.|
|Department of Transportation||2. The Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, FAA, to implement a computer capacity and performance management program for TRACON computer systems, including analyzing trends in data processing work loads to determine when existing system capacities will be saturated.|
|Department of Transportation||3. The Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, FAA, to implement a computer capacity and performance management program for TRACON computer systems, including conducting comprehensive analyses of the utilization, processing capacity, and input/output rates of present and projected work loads. Analyses of future work loads should include the full impact of the expanded Mode C rule.|
|Federal Aviation Administration||4. The Administrator, FAA, should ensure that the FAA Technical Center test facility uses configurations that more accurately replicate the processors, displays, and traffic at the busiest operational sites to ensure that approved software functions will work.|
|Department of Transportation||5. After implementing the program and identifying the work-load requirements for TRACON, the Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, FAA, to ensure that all future procurements of hardware and software are determined by these requirements.|
|Department of Transportation||6. Because a new advanced system is not scheduled to replace existing TRACON systems until the mid-to-late 1990s, the Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, FAA, to perform a complete analysis of all available alternatives for meeting the larger TRACON air traffic requirements for at least the next 10 years. Recognizing that the existing Automated Radar Terminal System (ARTS) IIIA design is over 15 years old, this analysis should seek to identify the most cost-effective solution for meeting FAA requirements.|