Skip to main content

Columbia Class Submarine: Program Lacks Essential Schedule Insight amid Continuing Construction Challenges

GAO-23-106292 Published: Jan 24, 2023. Publicly Released: Jan 24, 2023.
Jump To:

Fast Facts

The Navy is planning to spend $132 billion to develop and purchase 12 Columbia class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines—the largest and most complex submarine in its history. It plans to have the first one delivered in April 2027.

The Navy lacks insight into the program's schedule because the shipbuilder hasn't conducted a schedule risk analysis, which can help identify and manage risks to achieving planned delivery dates.

We recommended that the Navy conduct a schedule risk analysis to better manage the schedule for building this submarine.

Rendering of Columbia Class Submarine

A submarine at the surface of the water

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

The Navy plans to deliver the first, or lead, Columbia class submarine—the largest and most complex submarine in its history—more quickly than it did for the lead submarines of prior classes, such as the Virginia class program. But the shipbuilder has not conducted a schedule risk analysis of the lead submarine's construction schedule. Both GAO leading practices and Department of Defense (DOD) guidance identify schedule risk analysis as a critical tool for understanding and managing program risks that could impact the schedule.

Notional Representation of a Schedule Risk Analysis

Notional Representation of a Schedule Risk Analysis

Without a statistical schedule risk analysis, programs have limited insight into how schedule risks could affect the likelihood of achieving key program milestones, including delivery, and the amount of margin—or a reserve of extra time—needed to manage critical risks and avoid delays.

After more than a year of full-scale construction on the lead Columbia submarine, the shipbuilders are facing delays because of challenges with design, materials, and quality. The shipbuilders are working to mitigate delays using additional shipyard resources, such as more staff to complete work more quickly. Because of the Columbia class program's essential role in strategic deterrence, it has priority status over most national defense related programs, including the Virginia class program. The shipbuilder added staff to the Columbia class program who were originally planned for the Virginia class program, contributing to delays for that program. However, long-term planning does not account for shared risks between these programs that are likely to present production challenges and could result in additional costs. Without updated long-term planning, the Navy cannot be certain that the fiscal year 2024 budget request will be sufficient to meet the production schedule it has planned for these submarine classes.

Why GAO Did This Study

The Navy plans to invest roughly $132 billion to acquire 12 Columbia class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines. The shipbuilders are also constructing Virginia class attack submarines. Both classes are part of the Navy's plans for deterrence. Challenges delivering Columbia class submarines on time could have consequences for the nation's defense.

Congress includes a provision in statute for the Navy to provide updates on the Columbia program's design and construction goals, and for GAO to assess this information.

This report examines the extent that (1) the Navy and DOD assessed risks to achieving the lead Columbia class submarine's schedule, and (2) the program faced challenges constructing the lead submarine and mitigating construction risks to the class.

GAO compared actions the Navy and DOD took to assess schedule risks to DOD guidance and leading practices, and reviewed Navy and shipbuilder documents to identify construction challenges. GAO interviewed Navy and DOD officials and shipbuilder representatives. This is a public version of a sensitive report that issued in September 2022. Information deemed sensitive has been omitted.

Recommendations

GAO is making six recommendations, including that the Navy conduct a schedule risk analysis and update long-term plans. DOD concurred with four and partially concurred with two recommendations. GAO maintains that fully implementing all six recommendations is warranted, as discussed in this report.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of the Navy The Secretary of the Navy, in coordination with the program office, should seek to obtain lead and follow-on Columbia class construction schedule information in the shipbuilder's native file format or other format that is compatible with government scheduling software. (Recommendation 1)
Open
The Navy concurred with this recommendation and stated in February 2023 that the service had received the shipbuilder's schedule data in the native format in August 2021 and July 2022 for the lead and follow-on submarines, respectively. GAO could not confirm that these data are in a native format that can be easily accessible and analyzed by specialized schedule software as GAO recommended. After GAO followed up in September 2023, a Navy official stated that they did not obtain native schedule data but had identified a work around that would meet the intent of GAO's recommendation. GAO requested documentation from the Navy to confirm that this recommendation has been implemented and how, if at all, the Navy's workaround meets the intent of the recommendation. GAO will continue to monitor Navy's progress toward implementation of this recommendation.
Department of Defense The Secretary of Defense should ensure that OUSD(R&E) conducts a schedule risk analysis of the lead Columbia submarine's construction schedule to inform the first in-progress program review of 2023, and provide the results to the program office. (Recommendation 2)
Open
DOD partially concurred with this recommendation. DOD stated that schedule risk is a key area it monitors closely through multiple approaches, but did not fully agree that a quantitative schedule risk analysis was necessary. In February 2023 documentation, DOD stated the Milestone Decision Authority would task an independent organization to perform additional Columbia-class submarine schedule risk analyses and provide results to the program office once its complete. As of February 2023, DOD estimated completion of this action by December 2023. GAO will continue to monitor DOD's progress toward implementation of this recommendation.
Department of the Navy The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the program office uses the schedule risk analysis from OUSD(R&E), once provided, to update plans for the lead submarine's delivery, as appropriate, and mitigate any identified risks, as appropriate. (Recommendation 3)
Open
DOD partially concurred with this recommendation and February 2023 documentation stated action would be taken once the independent schedule risk analysis (recommendation 2) is complete. At that point, the COLUMBIA program office will incorporate additional risks into its established risk management processes, but as of September 2023, DOD reported completion of this action was still to-be-determined. GAO will continue to monitor DOD's progress toward implementation of this recommendation.
Department of the Navy The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the program determines an approach for conducting schedule risk analysis for future Columbia class submarines, to include who is responsible for conducting the analysis and when it will be conducted. (Recommendation 4)
Open
The Navy concurred with this recommendation and February 2023 documentation stated that based on the results of the independent schedule risk analysis (recommendation 2), the Secretary of the Navy will identify and task an organization to perform schedule evaluations for future Columbia class submarines by June 2023. In September 2023, GAO requested additional information regarding actions taken in response to this recommendation and will reevaluate the status of this recommendation once GAO receives additional information.
Department of the Navy The Secretary of the Navy should obtain updated information about the shipbuilders' Integrated Enterprise Plan that reflects the updated execution plans and resources needed to address shared risks across the nuclear shipbuilding enterprise. (Recommendation 5)
Open
The Navy concurred with this recommendation. In February 2023, Navy documentation stated that it had been working to update the shipbuilders' Integrated Enterprise Plan (IEP) since Fall 2021 to reflect updated execution plans and resources needed to address shared risks across Columbia and Virginia class programs and expected this to plan to be complete by December 2023. As of September 2023, the IEP had yet to be completed by the shipbuilders. GAO will continue to monitor Navy's progress toward implementation of this recommendation.
Department of the Navy The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the Fiscal Year 2024 30-year shipbuilding plan is informed by updated planning that reflects resources needed to address shared risks between the Columbia and Virginia class programs, in order to certify that the budget the Navy submitted is sufficient to procure submarines on the schedules outlined in the plan. (Recommendation 6)
Open
The Navy concurred with this recommendation, but at the time the FY2024 shipbuilding plan was being compiled, there were several additional analyses related to force structure that were pending and could have effects on the enterprise-wide risk analysis. GAO has asked DOD to confirm and to provide future plans, if any, for updating its 30-year shipbuilding plan with additional information related to shared risks across the nuclear shipbuilding enterprise. We will continue to monitor DOD's progress toward implementation of this recommendation.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

ConstructionConstruction schedulesNavy shipsSchedule slippagesShipbuildingSubmarinesMilitary forcesRisk assessmentEarned value management systemsAgency evaluations