Skip to main content

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority: Actions Needed to Strengthen Capital Planning and Track Preventive Maintenance Program

GAO-19-202 Published: Jan 31, 2019. Publicly Released: Jan 31, 2019.

Fast Facts

To address safety problems in the Washington, D.C., Metro rail system, Metro started a preventive track maintenance program in June 2017. The program aims to reduce service disruptions caused by track defects or electrical fires—which Metro says are the most significant safety risks.

While Metro reports making progress, it can't be sure that the program is designed effectively. For example, the program doesn't address non-electrical fires, which comprise 30% of all track fires.

We recommended a formal risk assessment, which would use data to assess safety and strategic risks to the program, such as ensuring adequate time for maintenance work.

 

A Washington, D.C. Metro train stopped at a platform.

A Washington, D.C. Metro train stopped at a platform.

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

From fiscal years 2011 through 2017, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) spent almost $6 billion on a variety of capital assets, with the largest share spent on improving its rail and bus fleet (see figure). Over this period, WMATA's capital spending was, on average, about $845 million annually.

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's Capital Expenditures by Asset Category, in Current Dollar Values, Fiscal Years 2011 through 2017

Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's Capital Expenditures by Asset Category, in Current Dollar Values, Fiscal Years 2011 through 2017

WMATA's new capital planning process could address some weaknesses it identified in the prior process. WMATA established a framework for quantitatively prioritizing capital needs (investments to a group of related assets) over a 10-year period. However, WMATA has not established documented policies and procedures for implementing the new process, such as those for selecting specific projects for funding in its annual capital budget. WMATA is currently using its new capital planning process to make fiscal year 2020 investment decisions. WMATA has proposed a fiscal year 2020 capital budget of $1.4 billion. Without documented policies and procedures for implementing the new planning process, WMATA's stakeholders do not have reasonable assurance that WMATA is following a sound process for making investment decisions.

WMATA has made significant progress toward its track preventive maintenance program's goals, which are to reduce both track-defect and electrical-fire incidents by 50 percent in fiscal year 2019 compared with 2017. In fiscal year 2018, WMATA met its goal for reducing track defect incidents and reduced electrical fire incidents by 20 percent. However, in designing the program, WMATA did not fully assess risks. For example, WMATA did not quantitatively assess the impact of track defects or electrical fires on its ability to provide service, nor did it consider other risks such as non-electrical track fires, which represent about 30 percent of all fires on the system, or other factors, such as resources or track time. Without a comprehensive risk assessment, WMATA lacks reasonable assurance that the program is designed to address risks affecting the safety of the rail system or other risks that could hinder the new program's success.

Why GAO Did This Study

Safety incidents in recent years on WMATA's rail system have raised questions about its processes for performing critical maintenance and replacing capital assets. WMATA initiated a new preventive maintenance program for its rail track in 2017, and is currently implementing a new capital planning process.

GAO was asked to examine issues related to WMATA's capital funding and maintenance practices. This report examines: (1) how WMATA spent its capital funds from fiscal years 2011 through 2017, (2) how WMATA's new capital planning process addresses weaknesses it identified in the prior process, and (3) WMATA's progress toward its track preventive maintenance program's goals and how the program aligns with leading program management practices. GAO analyzed WMATA's financial and program information, interviewed officials of WMATA, the Federal Transit Administration, and five transit agencies selected for similarities to WMATA. GAO compared WMATA's capital planning process and track maintenance program with leading practices.

Recommendations

GAO is making five recommendations, including that WMATA establish documented policies and procedures for the new capital planning process and conduct a comprehensive risk assessment for the track preventive maintenance program. WMATA described actions planned or underway to address GAO's recommendations. GAO believes the recommendations should be fully implemented, as discussed in the report.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority The General Manager of WMATA should establish documented policies and procedures for the new capital planning process. These policies and procedures should include methodologies for ranking and selecting capital projects for funding in WMATA's fiscal year 2020 capital budget and fiscal years 2020-2025 Capital Improvement Program and for future planning cycles. (Recommendation 1)
Closed – Implemented
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) provides critical rail and bus transit services to the nation's capital and surrounding areas. In 2019, GAO reported that from fiscal years 2011 through 2017, WMATA received about $5.8 billion for capital investments; over half of which came from the federal government ($3.2 billion), and 41 percent ($2.4 billion) was provided by state and local jurisdictions that WMATA serves. Starting in 2019, WMATA began developing a new capital planning process to improve its capital investment decision-making and to address weaknesses WMATA identified in its prior capital planning process. However, in 2019, GAO reported that WMATA had not...
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority The General Manager of WMATA should develop performance measures to be used for assessing capital investments and the capital planning process to determine if the investments and planning process have achieved their planned goals and objectives. (Recommendation 2)
Closed – Implemented
AIn 2024, GAO confirmed that WMATA had developed measures to assess the performance of its capital investments and its planning process. First, in 2022, WMATA created a Capital Investment Performance Outcome Measurement Program that was intended to (1) develop an inventory of performance measures and align those measures with agency strategic goals and objectives, (2) measure investment-specific outcomes, and (3) identify the benefits and effects of capital investments. In 2024, GAO reviewed this program and reported that WMATA had establish well defined, appropriate, clear, and measurable objectives, as called for in leading practices identified by GAO. Second, GAO also reported that...
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority The General Manager of WMATA should develop a plan for obtaining complete information regarding WMATA's asset inventory and physical condition assessments, including assets related to track and structures. (Recommendation 3)
Closed – Implemented
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) provides rail and bus transit services that are critical to the mobility and productivity of the nation's capital and surrounding areas. In recent years there have been questions about the safety of WMATA's rail transit system and whether WMATA has effective processes in place to replace assets and perform critical maintenance. In 2019, GAO reported that WMATA did not have a complete inventory or physical condition assessments of its assets, and that collecting such information is the critical, first step in determining what asset rehabilitations and replacements are needed for capital-investment decision making. GAO further...
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority The General Manager of WMATA should conduct a comprehensive risk assessment of the track preventive maintenance program that includes both a quantitative and qualitative assessment of relevant program risks. In addition to considering technical program risks, WMATA should also consider broader program risks, such as the availability of funding for the program and stakeholders' support. (Recommendation 4)
Closed – Implemented
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) provides transit services to the nation's capital and surrounding areas. Safety incidents on WMATA's rail system have raised questions about its processes for performing critical maintenance. In June 2017, WMATA began implementing a new track preventive maintenance program designed to improve the rail system's long-term reliability and safety. However, in 2019 GAO found that this program did not fully align with leading program management practices for assessing risks. Specifically, leading practices recommend that organizations identify risks to the achievement of their objectives and analyze risks as a basis for determining how...
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority The General Manager of WMATA should prepare a formal program management plan for the track preventive maintenance program that aligns with WMATA's strategic plan, addresses how the program is linked to overall strategic goals and objectives, and includes program milestones and decision points. (Recommendation 5)
Closed – Implemented
The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) provides critical rail and bus transit services to the nation's capital and surrounding areas. Safety incidents in recent years on WMATA's rail system have raised questions about its processes for performing critical maintenance and replacing capital assets. In June 2017, WMATA began implementing a new track preventive maintenance program designed to improve the rail system's long-term safety and reliability. However, in 2019 GAO found that WMATA's track preventive maintenance program did not fully align with leading program management practices, including developing a program management plan that aligns with organizational goals...

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Best practicesCapital budgetsCapital expendituresCapital investmentsPreventive maintenanceRailTransportation safetyCapitalMetropolitan areasInventory