Skip to main content

Countering Violent Extremism: Actions Needed to Define Strategy and Assess Progress of Federal Efforts

GAO-17-300 Published: Apr 06, 2017. Publicly Released: Apr 06, 2017.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

As of December 2016, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ), Federal Bureau of Investigation, and National Counterterrorism Center had implemented 19 of the 44 domestically-focused tasks identified in the 2011 Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) for countering violent extremism (CVE) in the United States. Twenty-three tasks were in progress and no action had yet been taken on 2 tasks. The 44 tasks aim to address three core CVE objectives: community outreach, research and training, and capacity building. Implemented tasks include, for example, DOJ conducting CVE outreach meetings to communities targeted by violent extremism and DHS integrating CVE content into law enforcement counterterrorism training. Tasks in progress include, for example, DHS building relationships with the social media industry and increasing training available to communities to counter violent extremists online. Tasks that had not yet been addressed include, implementing CVE activities in prisons and learning from former violent extremists. Federal CVE efforts aim to educate and prevent radicalization before a crime or terrorist act transpires, and differ from counterterrorism efforts such as collecting evidence and making arrests before an event has occurred.

Figure: Countering Violent Extremism is Different from Counterterrorism

Figure: Countering Violent Extremism is Different from Counterterrorism

The federal government does not have a cohesive strategy or process for assessing the overall CVE effort. Although GAO was able to determine the status of the 44 CVE tasks, it was not able to determine if the United States is better off today than it was in 2011 as a result of these tasks. This is because no cohesive strategy with measurable outcomes has been established to guide the multi-agency CVE effort. Such a strategy could help ensure that the individual actions of stakeholder agencies are measureable and contributing to the overall goals of the federal government's CVE effort. The federal government also has not established a process by which to evaluate the effectiveness of the collective CVE effort. The CVE Task Force was established in part to evaluate and assess CVE efforts across the federal government, but has not established a process for doing so. Evaluating the progress and effectiveness of the overall federal CVE effort could better help identify successes, gaps, and resource needs across stakeholder agencies.

Violent extremism—generally defined as ideologically, religious, or politically- motivated acts of violence—has been perpetrated in the United States by white supremacists, anti-government groups, and radical Islamist entities, among others. In 2011, the U.S. government developed a national strategy and SIP for CVE aimed at providing information and resources to communities. In 2016, an interagency CVE Task Force led by DHS and DOJ was created to coordinate CVE efforts.

GAO was asked to review domestic federal CVE efforts. This report addresses the extent to which (1) DHS, DOJ, and other key stakeholders tasked with CVE in the United States have implemented the 2011 SIP and (2) the federal government has developed a strategy to implement CVE activities, and the CVE Task Force has assessed progress. GAO assessed the status of activities in the 2011 SIP; interviewed officials from agencies leading CVE efforts and a non-generalizable group of community-based entities selected from cities with CVE frameworks; and compared Task Force activities to selected best practices for multi- agency efforts.

Recommendations

GAO recommends that DHS and DOJ direct the CVE Task Force to (1) develop a cohesive strategy with measurable outcomes and (2) establish a process to assess the overall progress of CVE efforts. DHS and DOJ concurred with both recommendations and DHS described the CVE Task Force's planned actions for implementation.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Homeland Security To help identify what domestic CVE efforts are to achieve and the extent to which investments in CVE result in measureable success, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General--as heads of the two lead agencies responsible for coordinating CVE efforts--should direct the CVE Task Force to develop a cohesive strategy that includes measurable outcomes for CVE activities.
Closed – Not Implemented
We are closing this recommendation as not implemented because the CVE Task Force has disbanded and DHS is no longer in a position to lead actions on this recommendation. DHS stated that the National Security Council would now be the entity responsible for originating a national CVE strategy since the CVE Task Force was no longer in use and DHS did not have authority over other agencies' activities. Further, in April 2021, DHS stated that the National Security Council was conducting a review of the federal government's domestic terrorism and domestic violent extremism programs and activities, which includes CVE. In June 2021, the White House issued a National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism, which we plan to assess, including the extent to which it includes measurable outcomes for CVE activities.
Department of Justice To help identify what domestic CVE efforts are to achieve and the extent to which investments in CVE result in measureable success, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General--as heads of the two lead agencies responsible for coordinating CVE efforts--should direct the CVE Task Force to develop a cohesive strategy that includes measurable outcomes for CVE activities.
Closed – Not Implemented
We are closing this recommendation as not implemented because the CVE Task Force has disbanded and DOJ is no longer in a position to lead actions on this recommendation. In May 2021, DOJ stated that the National Security Council was evaluating the federal government's domestic terrorism and domestic violent extremism programs and activities, which includes CVE. In June 2021, the White House issued a National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism, which we plan to assess, including the extent to which it includes measurable outcomes for CVE activities.
Department of Homeland Security To help identify what domestic CVE efforts are to achieve and the extent to which investments in CVE result in measureable success, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General--as heads of the two lead agencies responsible for coordinating CVE efforts--should direct the CVE Task Force to establish and implement a process to assess overall progress in CVE, including its effectiveness.
Closed – Not Implemented
We are closing this recommendation as not implemented because the CVE Task Force has disbanded and DHS is no longer in a position to lead actions on this recommendation. In April 2021, DHS stated that the National Security Council was evaluating the federal government's domestic terrorism and domestic violent extremism programs and activities, which includes CVE. As applicable, we will review the outcomes of this evaluation, such as the June 2021 National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism, to determine if the federal government has taken steps to assess overall progress in CVE.
Department of Justice To help identify what domestic CVE efforts are to achieve and the extent to which investments in CVE result in measureable success, the Secretary of Homeland Security and the Attorney General--as heads of the two lead agencies responsible for coordinating CVE efforts--should direct the CVE Task Force to establish and implement a process to assess overall progress in CVE, including its effectiveness.
Closed – Not Implemented
We are closing this recommendation as not implemented because the CVE Task Force has disbanded and DOJ is no longer in a position to lead actions on this recommendation. In May 2021, DOJ stated that the National Security Council was evaluating the federal government's domestic terrorism and domestic violent extremism programs and activities, which includes CVE. As applicable, we will review the outcomes of this evaluation, such as the June 2021 National Strategy for Countering Domestic Terrorism, to determine if the federal government has taken steps to assess overall progress in CVE.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Topics

CounterterrorismBest practicesCrimesHomeland securityLaw enforcementPolice trainingRisk factorsRisk managementStrategic forcesStrategic planningTerrorism