Congress enacted a program to compensate Department of Energy employees and contractors in the atomic weapons industry who developed work-related illnesses. Department of Labor (Labor) administers the program using estimates of workers' likely radiation exposure to decide claims. The estimates are produced by Health and Human Services' (HHS) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) and reviewed by the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health. NIOSH awarded a contract to Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) to help carry out its work. GAO examined: (1) costs and oversight of NIOSH's contracts, (2) implementation of the conflict of interest policy for NIOSH and its contractors, (3) the extent of Labor's involvement in NIOSH's activities and actions to deny benefits, and (4) challenges to advisory board independence and options to enhance it. GAO reviewed contract files, examined Labor's comments on NIOSH documents, and analyzed data on cases sent to NIOSH for rework.
Matter for Congressional Consideration
|In light of the potential vulnerabilities of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health, Congress may wish to consider the options related to funding, appointment of members, and advisory board reporting that we have identified to further enhance the independence of the advisory board.||The House passed H.R. 5687 to amend the Federal Advisory Committee Act to improve the balance, transparency, and independence of federal advisory committees (which would include the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health). The bill's provisions address a number of aspects of federal advisory committees, including conflict of interest disclosure of appointed individuals, independent reporting, and prospective member selection process.|
Recommendations for Executive Action
|Department of Health and Human Services||To strengthen NIOSH's oversight of costs incurred in the dose reconstruction program and improve NIOSH's review and approval process for contractor billings, the Secretary of Health and Human Services should direct the Director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Procurement and Grants Office to establish appropriate policies and procedures for effective review and approval of the prime contractor's invoices. Such policies and procedures should specify the steps to be performed for review and approval, the individuals responsible for carrying out these steps, the level of invoice detail needed to perform an appropriate review, and the appropriate documentation to be maintained of that review process.|
|Department of Health and Human Services||To strengthen NIOSH's oversight of costs incurred in the dose reconstruction program and improve NIOSH's review and approval process for contractor billings, the Secretary of Health and Human Services should direct the Director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Procurement and Grants Office to establish a policy and procedures to periodically assess the prime contractor's oversight of subcontractor costs to determine if there are any deficiencies and corrective actions needed and assess whether the controls can be sufficiently relied on to ensure that subcontractor payments are allowable, reasonable, and in compliance with all Federal Acquisition Regulations and contract requirements.|
|Department of Labor||To increase transparency and facilitate congressional oversight of Labor's involvement in NIOSH activities, the Secretary of Labor should take steps to ensure that Labor's comments on draft NIOSH technical documents and special exposure cohort petition evaluations more explicitly indicate how the comments are intended to promote clarity and consistency, and thereby facilitate Labor's adjudication of claims. This could include a brief explanation accompanying Labor's comments on each NIOSH document, that would adequately describe Labor's specific rationale for its comments.|
|Department of Health and Human Services||To further enhance the independence of the President's Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health, the Secretary of HHS should implement the agency's regulatory responsibility under the Federal Advisory Committee Act to develop procedures to ensure that the advisory board's work is not unduly influenced by the appointing authority or any special interests. These procedures could include a provision specifying that federal officials who fill key board support roles must be independent of the dose reconstruction program.|