Skip to main content

Coalition Warfare: Gulf War Allies Differed in Chemical and Biological Threats Identified and in Use of Defensive Measures

GAO-01-13 Published: Apr 24, 2001. Publicly Released: May 24, 2001.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO confirmed differences among the United States, the United Kingdom, and France in the rates at which illnesses have been reported among their Gulf War veterans; their assessment of nuclear, biological, and chemical threats in the Gulf; and their preparations to meet them. However, because of differences in the experiences of the three sets of veterans, there is no single, unambiguous cause that can be identified for the reported illnesses. If multinational allies are to act in a coordinated fashion, they require a similar level of awareness of and preparation for the threats to be faced; otherwise, force protection and operational success could be jeopardized and the utility of some forces restricted. Gulf War Coalition members prepared for somewhat different threats and used different countermeasures. In addition, the U.S. lacked clear doctrine for timely and systematic warning of allied forces and U.S. ground troops about pending strikes on suspected nuclear, biological, and chemical targets.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Biological warfareChemical warfareComparative analysisDefense contingency planningEmergency preparednessForeign governmentsGulf war syndromeImmunization programsInternational relationsRadiological warfareVeteransIraq War (1991)