Skip to Highlights

A firm protested the Navy's rejection of its bid for roof replacement and repair, contending that the Navy improperly rejected its bid as nonresponsive. GAO held that the Navy properly rejected the protester's bid as nonresponsive, since: (1) its bid bond had been inappropriately altered; and (2) it did not show evidence that the surety consented to the alteration. Accordingly, the protest was denied.