Skip to Highlights

A firm protested an Army contract award for telescope sight units, contending that: (1) the Army improperly rejected its bid by making a nonresponsibility determination; and (2) the awardee's bid price was unreasonable. GAO held that: (1) the Army properly rejected the protester's bid, since it did not include a required technical proposal; and (2) the protester was not sufficiently interested to protest the awardee's bid price. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.