Skip to Highlights

A firm protested an Air Force contract award for the upgrade of officer quarters, contending that the Air Force did not award the contract consistent with the solicitation specifications. GAO held that the: (1) Air Force amended the solicitation to separate its requirements and require the bidders to submit bid prices for each requirement; (2) protester was obligated to clarify the ambiguous solicitation specifications; (3) solicitation notified bidders that the Air Force would evaluate all bid items as part of the bidders' base bids; and (4) Air Force properly evaluated the bids based on the total bid items. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

View Decision

B-247029.2, Jan 14, 1992

DIGEST: Protest filed at the General Accounting Office more than 10 days after receipt of initial decision denying agency-level protest is dismissed as untimely; protester's continued pursuant of protest with agency does not toll timeliness requirements.


Telestar International Corp.-- Reconsideration:

Telestar International Corporation requests reconsideration of our December 17, 1991, dismissal of its protest of the award of a contract by the Department of Navy under solicitation No. N60530-91-R-0179.

We deny the reconsideration request.

Our original decision dismissed the protest, which was filed in our Office on December 16, as untimely because it was filed more than 10 working days after the protester initially received the November 7 denial of its agency-level protest. /1/ Our Bid Protest Regulations provide that where a protest is initially filed with a contracting activity any subsequent protest to our Office, to be considered timely, must be filed within 10 working days of "actual or constructive knowledge of initial adverse agency action," which in this case was the receipt of the formal denial of the agency-level protest. 4 C.F.R. Sec. 21.2(a)(3) (1991).

In its reconsideration request Telestar states that it responded to the agency's November 7 denial of its protest and that the agency is still considering its response. Since the agency's November 7 denial of Telestar's agency-level protest clearly constituted the initial adverse agency action, the 10-day period began to run when Telestar received the November 7 letter. The fact that Telestar disagreed with the agency's response and attempted to have it changed before it filed its protest with our Office did not toll our timeliness requirements. Once informed of the initial adverse agency action, a protester may not delay filing a subsequent protest with our Office while it continues to pursue the protest with the agency. Tecniventas, S.A.-- Recon., B-240323.2, Oct. 19, 1990, 90-2 CPD Para. 320. Since Telestar did not file its protest with our Office within 10 days of its receipt of the agency denial of its protest, its protest to our Office was properly dismissed as untimely.

The reconsideration is denied.

/1/ Where, as here, it is not clear from the record when a letter is received we assume delivery within 1-calendar week of its mailing. See Jemtec Elecs. Corp., B-244781, Aug. 2, 1991, 91-2 CPD Para. 124. Thus, we presume that Telestar received the agency's November 7 letter on November 14.