Chemical and Biological Defense:

Emphasis Remains Insufficient to Resolve Continuing Problems

T-NSIAD-96-123: Published: Mar 12, 1996. Publicly Released: Mar 12, 1996.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO discussed its assessment of U.S. forces' capability to fight and survive chemical and biological warfare. GAO noted that: (1) none of the Army's crisis-response or early-deployment units have complied with requirements for stocking equipment critical for fighting under chemical or biological warfare; (2) the Department of Defense (DOD) has established two joint service groups to prioritize chemical and biological defense research efforts, develop a modernization plan, and develop support plans; (3) although DOD has begun to field a biological agent detection system, it has not successfully fielded other needed equipment and systems to address critical battlefield deficiencies; (4) ground forces are inadequately trained to conduct critical tasks related to biological and chemical warfare, and there are serious weaknesses at all levels in chemical and biological defense skills; (5) medical units often lack the equipment and training needed to treat casualties resulting from chemical or biological contamination; (6) DOD has inadequate stocks of vaccines for known threat agents and has not implemented an immunization policy established in 1993; and (7) the primary cause for these deficiencies is a lack of emphasis along the DOD command chain, with DOD focusing its efforts and resources on other priorities.

Mar 15, 2018

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 7, 2018

Feb 15, 2018

Feb 7, 2018

Feb 1, 2018

Jan 16, 2018

Jan 10, 2018

Dec 14, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here