Skip to main content

Chemical and Biological Defense: Emphasis Remains Insufficient to Resolve Continuing Problems

T-NSIAD-96-123 Published: Mar 12, 1996. Publicly Released: Mar 12, 1996.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed its assessment of U.S. forces' capability to fight and survive chemical and biological warfare. GAO noted that: (1) none of the Army's crisis-response or early-deployment units have complied with requirements for stocking equipment critical for fighting under chemical or biological warfare; (2) the Department of Defense (DOD) has established two joint service groups to prioritize chemical and biological defense research efforts, develop a modernization plan, and develop support plans; (3) although DOD has begun to field a biological agent detection system, it has not successfully fielded other needed equipment and systems to address critical battlefield deficiencies; (4) ground forces are inadequately trained to conduct critical tasks related to biological and chemical warfare, and there are serious weaknesses at all levels in chemical and biological defense skills; (5) medical units often lack the equipment and training needed to treat casualties resulting from chemical or biological contamination; (6) DOD has inadequate stocks of vaccines for known threat agents and has not implemented an immunization policy established in 1993; and (7) the primary cause for these deficiencies is a lack of emphasis along the DOD command chain, with DOD focusing its efforts and resources on other priorities.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Biological warfareChemical agentsBiological agentsChemical warfareCombat readinessDefense capabilitiesImmunization servicesMedical equipmentMilitary materielMilitary operationsMilitary research and developmentMilitary training