Skip to main content

Lapse in Appropriations

Please note that a lapse in appropriations has caused GAO to shut down its operations. Therefore, GAO will not be able to publish reports or otherwise update this website until GAO resumes operations. In addition, the vast majority of GAO personnel are not permitted to work. Consequently, calls or emails to agency personnel may not be returned until GAO resumes operations. For details on how the bid protest process will be handled during the shutdown, please see the legal decisions page. For information related to the GAO Personnel Appeals Board (PAB), please see the PAB webpage.

Hanford Waste Privatization

RCED-96-213R Published: Aug 02, 1996. Publicly Released: Sep 03, 1996.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the Department of Energy's (DOE) planned privatization of its Hanford tank waste cleanup effort. GAO noted that: (1) technical difficulties with DOE tank waste cleanup efforts have caused schedules delays, program component cancellation, and uncertainties about program costs; (2) DOE believes its phased approach and privatization strategy will help resolve these problems and control costs; (3) DOE prefers the phased approach because it believes this approach balances compliance with laws and regulations, health and environmental risks, and technological uncertainties; (4) although cost estimates under DOE privatization approach are subject to change, total costs under this approach are estimated to be $9.6 billion which is 28 percent less than the traditional approach; (5) regulatory and technical uncertainties could adversely affect the DOE privatization strategy; (6) to support privatization, DOE needs to ensure that certain tank waste operations are completed, state regulatory approval is obtained, and basic site support services are provided; (7) DOE is developing a fallback strategy, called the alternative path, which requires DOE to retain skilled cleanup staff during the first few years of privatization and considering alternative management approaches if privatization fails; and (8) DOE estimates that it could still meet its 2028 completion milestone under an alternative management approach but at a higher cost.

Full Report

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Atomic energy defense activitiesCost controlEnvironment evaluationLife cycle costsNuclear facilitiesNuclear waste managementPrivatizationRadioactive waste disposalTanks (containers)Waste treatment