Skip to main content

Pesticides: Better Sampling and Enforcement Needed on Imported Food

RCED-86-219 Published: Sep 26, 1986. Publicly Released: Dec 03, 1986.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) efforts to protect the public from exposure to illegal pesticide residues in imported food.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Health and Human Services The Secretary of Health and Human Services should direct the Commissioner, FDA, to: (1) redirect resources away from highly sampled commodities with low violation rates to provide coverage of a wide range of imported commodities and importing countries, using a comprehensive monitoring summary to assist in the analysis; and (2) improve monitoring of importers and commodities with histories of pesticide violations by continuing follow-up sampling and certification requirements through successive growing seasons.
Closed – Implemented
FDA District Offices are now required to prepare annual import sampling plans. FDA has developed automated data on what is being imported into the United States, which will serve as the basis for measuring sampling coverage and identifying gaps. The Pesticide Monitoring Improvements Act of 1988 requires FDA to establish computerized data management systems to track the results of its program.
Department of Health and Human Services The Secretary of Health and Human Services should direct the Commissioner, FDA, to assess the relative merits of the alternative means to obtain information on actual foreign pesticide use, including current legislative and regulatory authority, and: (1) require U.S. pesticide manufacturers who export pesticide chemicals to foreign countries to report the pesticides and quantities sold overseas; (2) require importers of food to certify which pesticides were used during production; and (3) develop cooperative agreements with foreign countries for the exchange of information on pesticide usage in food production.
Closed – Implemented
FDA chose to dismiss the three options GAO identified in favor of buying pesticide use data from an unproven commercial database. This data bank was judged by FDA to be the most useful and comprehensive source of foreign pesticide use information. The Pesticide Monitoring Improvements Act of 1988, however, requires FDA to enter into cooperative agreements with foreign countries.
Department of Health and Human Services As better information becomes available on foreign pesticide uses, the Secretary of Health and Human Services should direct the Commissioner, FDA, to test imported food for the pesticides used or suspected of being used on imported foods.
Closed – Implemented
FDA claims it is using this data but until GAO conducts a review, which is scheduled to begin in spring 1992, the agency will not be in a position to state whether it is in fact implementing the recommendation.
Department of Health and Human Services The Secretary of Health and Human Services should direct the Commissioner, FDA, to recommend to Customs that liquidated damages be assessed for all shipments found to contain illegal pesticide residues if the shipment is not recovered. This assessment should apply whether the shipment was sampled under surveillance or compliance.
Closed – Implemented
FDA plans to re-examine its current policy concerning the assessment of damages in connection with the import of perishable foods that FDA samples on a surveillance basis (sampled without suspicion of violation). FDA also plans to automate its tracking system of violative products. GAO is currently reviewing the disposition of adulterated food which will also include an assessment of penalties.
Department of the Treasury The Secretary of the Treasury should direct the Commissioner of Customs to assess and collect liquidated damages from importers in all cases when FDA determines that imported food has been adulterated with illegal pesticide residues and the food is not recovered.
Closed – Implemented
Customs is automating its fines, penalties, and forfeiture activities to ensure that, when directed by FDA, damages will be assessed and collected. Customs is in the process of following up on uncollected damages, but GAO has not been able to ascertain the results. GAO is currently reviewing the disposition of adulterated food which will also include assessing and collecting liquidated damages.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Agency missionsAgricultural productsCommodity marketingConsumer protectionFood inspectionImport regulationMonitoringPesticidesTestingAgricultural commodities