Development Status of Rapid Transit/System of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida
PSAD-80-49: Published: Jun 5, 1980. Publicly Released: Jun 5, 1980.
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the development status of the rapid transit system of Metropolitan Dade County, Florida (MDC). The project is proceeding with assistance grants from the Urban Mass Transportation Administration (UMTA). The review identified significant cost increases and problems with the project development sequence. UMTA is entering into a full-funding contract with MDC, with additional Federal funding limited to extraordinary costs.
MDC cost estimates for the construction of the rapid transit system have increased by about $71.8 million since the project was approved by UMTA in 1977. The scheduled review operations date has been extended 16 months. GAO found that MDC is using the program reserve account to offset increases in other accounts. GAO believes that the MDC cost estimate is still understated by about $81.4 million, and further increases are possible because of potential schedule delays. UMTA officials disagree that the project cost estimate is understated by about $81.4 million, based upon some recent contract awards. However, GAO noted that a large number of contracts, which are yet to be awarded, could involve unexpectedly high procurement costs. UMTA officials stated that the GAO estimate does not take into consideration the fluctuating rate of inflation. Delays in right-of-way acquisition and lack of the specified rail and test track also pose project problems. UMTA officials advised GAO that MDC is taking all possible actions to obtain rights-of-way and avoid construction delays. UMTA is also coordinating closely with MDC on negotiated rail procurements.
Recommendation for Executive Action
Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.
Recommendation: GAO recommended that the Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator of UMTA to (1) emphasize development on the MDC rapid rail system to the north section to minimize the potential delay in the scheduled revenue operation; (2) coordinate closely with MDC in procuring rail to shorten the approval period for any negotiated procurements; and (3) give particular attention, during its quarterly MDC project reviews, to those factors that may cause the Federal participation to exceed the amount in the full-funding agreement.