Management Attention Is Needed To Identify Reasons for High Volume of Serviceable Material Returns to Depots
PLRD-81-12: Published: Mar 26, 1981. Publicly Released: Mar 26, 1981.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
GAO reviewed the Army's management of field returns of serviceable material to Army depots.
GAO found that the Army does not identify the causes for field returns of serviceable excess material. When the logistics system is operating effectively, there should be few field returns of serviceable material. Every material return to the wholesale level represents an expenditure of resources in terms of work force to process and handle the item and transportation costs from the depot to the retail level and return. At the retail level, the transportation cost for returned items was paid with Army operation and maintenance funds. Because these funds were used to pay for all transportation, the cost for returned items could not readily be identified. In addition, GAO found that the Army has no procedures for accumulating data to accurately reflect the reasons for material returns. Two general reasons given for the returns were: (1) items become excess to installation supply when authorized stockage levels are revised, and (2) items become excess to installation supply authorized stockage levels due to returns by using units.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status:
Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of the Army should establish a pilot program at one or more Army installations to identify and quantify the reasons for excess material and field returns.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Army
Status:
Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of the Army should provide information to Army managers on the reasons for excess material and field returns so that corrective action can be taken.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Army
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
Feb 26, 2021
![defense icon, source: [West Covina, California] Progressive Management, 2008](https://www.gao.gov/images/rip/defense.jpg "defense icon, source: [West Covina, California] Progressive Management, 2008")
Defense Transportation:
DOD Can Better Leverage Existing Contested Mobility Studies and Improve TrainingGAO-21-125: Published: Feb 26, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 26, 2021.
Feb 25, 2021
-
Military Service Uniforms:
DOD Could Better Identify and Address Out-of-Pocket Cost InequitiesGAO-21-120: Published: Feb 25, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 25, 2021.
Feb 24, 2021
-
Defense Budget:
Opportunities Exist to Improve DOD's Management of Defense SpendingGAO-21-415T: Published: Feb 24, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 24, 2021.
Feb 22, 2021
-
Service Acquisitions:
DOD's Report to Congress Identifies Steps Taken to Improve Management, But Does Not Address Some Key Planning IssuesGAO-21-267R: Published: Feb 22, 2021. Publicly Released: Feb 22, 2021.
Jan 21, 2021
-
Close Air Support:
Actions Needed to Enhance Friendly Force Tracking Capabilities and Fully Evaluate TrainingGAO-21-99: Published: Jan 21, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 21, 2021.
Jan 19, 2021
-
GPS Modernization:
DOD Continuing to Develop New Jam-Resistant Capability, But Widespread Use Remains Years AwayGAO-21-145: Published: Jan 19, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 19, 2021.
Jan 14, 2021
-
Columbia Class Submarine:
Delivery Hinges on Timely and Quality Materials from an Atrophied Supplier BaseGAO-21-257: Published: Jan 14, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 14, 2021. -
Department of Defense:
Actions Needed to Improve Accounting of Intradepartmental TransactionsGAO-21-84: Published: Jan 14, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 14, 2021.
Jan 12, 2021
-
DOD Critical Technologies:
Plans for Communicating, Assessing, and Overseeing Protection Efforts Should Be CompletedGAO-21-158: Published: Jan 12, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 12, 2021.
Dec 10, 2020
-
Climate Resilience:
DOD Coordinates with Communities, but Needs to Assess the Performance of Related Grant ProgramsGAO-21-46: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
Explore our Key Issues on National Defense
- Countering Overseas Threats
- Department of Energy's Contract Management for the National Nuclear Security Administration and Office of Environmental Management - High Risk Issue
- DOD Approach to Business Transformation - High Risk Issue
- DOD Contract Management - High Risk Issue
- DOD Supply Chain Management - High Risk Issue
- DOD Support Infrastructure Management - High Risk Issue
- DOD Weapon Systems Acquisition - High Risk Issue
- Ensuring the Effective Protection of Technologies Critical to U.S. National Security Interests - High Risk Issue
- Government-wide Personnel Security Clearance Process – High-Risk Issue
- Intelligence Community Management
- Military Readiness
- NASA Acquisitions - High Risk Issue
- Nuclear Nonproliferation
- Nuclear Waste Disposal
- Nuclear Weapons and Forces Sustainment and Modernization
- Uncrewed Aircraft Systems
- U.S. Arctic Interests
- U.S. - China Relations
- Water Quality and Protection
Explore our other Key Issues here
