Skip to main content

Army Logistics: Low Returns of Reparable Assets Are Costing the Army Millions

NSIAD-91-272 Published: Sep 25, 1991. Publicly Released: Sep 25, 1991.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined the Army's efforts in returning assets in need of repair to reduce procurement costs and improve military readiness, focusing on whether the: (1) Army has bought additional assets or cancelled repairs because it has not met its return-rate goal; (2) Army's reported return rate accurately reflects the actual rate of return; (3) Army's goal to return 85 percent of assets that need repair was established to maximize savings and efficiency; and (4) Army's efforts to improve rates of return will strengthen its materiel returns program.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of the Army The Secretary of the Army should reemphasize to the commanders of all major Army commands the importance of complying with Army policy and requirements for the prompt return of assets needing repair.
Closed – Implemented
On January 14, 1992, the Army sent a message to all major commands reemphasizing the need to return depot-level reparables.
Department of the Army The Secretary of the Army should direct the Commander, Army Materiel Command (AMC), to instruct its inventory control points to adopt management emphasis techniques similar to those used by the Army Missile Command to improve the rates of return for reparable items. Management emphasis should include early detection of items with low rates, determination of causes, identification and execution of specific actions to improve returns, and follow-up analysis to determine whether return rates have improved.
Closed – Implemented
On January 6, 1992, the Army tasked AMC to examine the Missile Command's techniques. According to AMC inventory control points, some of the Command's techniques were already in place; others were being implemented; and some were partially adopted where cost versus benefits were favorable. The Army also believes that the new stock funding concept has increased reparable item management.
Department of the Army The Secretary of the Army should direct the Commander, AMC, to direct the Logistics Control Activity (LCA) to include in its calculation of return rates only items with assets the Army routinely issues and requires corresponding returns of assets needing repair and to group related items for calculating rates-of-return.
Closed – Implemented
LCA completed its review on June 4, 1992. The review concluded that calculations of rates-of-return for assets routinely issued and grouping related items together are currently being accomplished under the Recovery Improvement Program Reporting System. GAO believes this action accomplishes the intent of the recommendation.
Department of the Army The Secretary of the Army should direct the Commander, AMC, to establish a reparable asset rate-of-return standard that assumes all assets will be returned except for the shortfall due to disposal of assets authorized at the retail level.
Closed – Implemented
The AMSAA study was deferred due to higher priority projects as a result of the Army's transition to stock funding of reparables in 1992. During this time, the Army increased its returns goal from 85 to 90 percent, and since the transition to stock funding, the return rate averaged over 90 percent. GAO believes these actions effectively accomplish the intent of the recommendation.
Department of the Army The Secretary of the Army should direct the Commander, AMC, to report again the low rate of return for reparable assets as a material weakness in the Army's next assessment of internal controls, as required by the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act.
Closed – Implemented
The Army reported the low rate-of-return for reparable assets as a material weakness in its Statement of Internal Controls, dated November 13, 1991.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Army procurementArmy suppliesEquipment repairsInternal controlsInventory control systemsMilitary cost controlMilitary inventoriesProperty and supply managementReporting requirementsMilitary forces