Army Training:

Need to Improve Assessments of Land Requirements and Priorities

NSIAD-90-44BR: Published: Dec 1, 1989. Publicly Released: Dec 5, 1989.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined the Army's overall training land acquisition plans and procedures, focusing on: (1) the extent to which the Commission on Base Realignment and Closure's work affected the Army's acquisition plans; and (2) whether a failure to expand Ft. Riley would make it vulnerable to closing as part of any future base-closing efforts.

GAO found that: (1) the Army did not follow established land acquisition procedures or have a basis for determining relative training land needs among installations; (2) individual commanders initiated most of the land acquisitions for specific installations, rather than considering Army installations' collective needs; (3) although the Army was making changes to its outdated training land acquisition process, it had not established a completion date and had conflicting information on the planned acquisitions at Ft. Riley; (4) Army requirements for alternatives to land acquisition early in the process did not precede preliminary land requirement decisions and was usually done at the installation level under limited decisionmaking authority; (5) although the Commission indicated that the Army needed additional land at 13 installations to satisfy its requirements, the Commission did not suggest closing Ft. Riley; and (6) the potential impact of uncertain future force reductions was unclear.

Nov 20, 2020

Nov 19, 2020

Nov 18, 2020

Nov 5, 2020

Oct 29, 2020

Oct 21, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here