Administrative Systems:
NASA Should Reassess Its AIM Program and Rescind Its IBM-Compatible Policy
IMTEC-90-41: Published: May 1, 1990. Publicly Released: May 8, 1990.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
(202) 512-4841
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) automatic data processing (ADP) procurement practices.
GAO found that NASA: (1) relied on headquarters and each of its nine centers to individually process automated administrative data; (2) did not provide adequate documentation justifying its decision to decentralize the operation of Automated Information Management (AIM) program systems; (3) did not perform comparative cost analyses to determine the number of sites needed to operate AIM systems; and (4) did not consider alternative approaches for implementing new or redesigned systems or ensure that the operation of AIM systems at each decentralized location was the most cost-effective and efficient approach. GAO also found that: (1) NASA did not adequately justify its policy requiring compatible hardware for all administrative computer systems; and (2) negative aspects of the policy that excluded non-compatible equipment outweighed the benefits of the policy.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: NASA decided to continue with a decentralized approach to processing AIM systems. The agency did not analyze the cost and benefit of a centralized approach.
Recommendation: To ensure that NASA AIM systems are implemented in the most cost-effective manner for meeting its needs, the Administrator, NASA, should direct NASA to determine the most cost-effective approach, including the number of locations and the hardware architecture for operating AIM systems, by conducting a comparative cost analysis of the various alternatives.
Agency Affected: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: NASA decided to continue with a decentralized approach to processing AIM systems.
Recommendation: To ensure that NASA AIM systems are implemented in the most cost-effective manner for meeting its needs, the Administrator, NASA, should direct NASA to implement the best approach, given the results of the analysis, which may result in using either an International Business Machines Corp. (IBM)-compatible or a non-IBM-compatible architecture to process AIM at a centralized location, continue AIM on a decentralized basis at each center, or a combination of those approaches.
Agency Affected: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: NASA has rescinded the policy.
Recommendation: The Administrator, NASA, should rescind the policy requiring IBM-compatible hardware for all agency administrative systems.
Agency Affected: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
Dec 22, 2020
Commercial Space Transportation:
FAA Should Examine a Range of Options to Support U.S. Launch InfrastructureGAO-21-154: Published: Dec 22, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 22, 2020.
Dec 15, 2020
-
NASA Human Space Exploration:
Significant Investments in Future Capabilities Require Strengthened Management OversightGAO-21-105: Published: Dec 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 15, 2020.
Apr 30, 2020
-
Priority Open Recommendations:
National Aeronautics and Space AdministrationGAO-20-526PR: Published: Apr 23, 2020. Publicly Released: Apr 30, 2020.
Apr 29, 2020
-
NASA:
Assessments of Major ProjectsGAO-20-405: Published: Apr 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Apr 29, 2020.
Jan 29, 2020
-
NASA Commercial Crew Program:
Significant Work Remains to Begin Operational Missions to the Space StationGAO-20-121: Published: Jan 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 29, 2020.
Jan 28, 2020
-
James Webb Space Telescope:
Technical Challenges Have Caused Schedule Strain and May Increase CostsGAO-20-224: Published: Jan 28, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 28, 2020.
Dec 19, 2019
-
NASA Lunar Programs:
Opportunities Exist to Strengthen Analyses and Plans for Moon LandingGAO-20-68: Published: Dec 19, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 19, 2019.
Sep 18, 2019
-
NASA:
Actions Needed to Improve the Management of Human Spaceflight ProgramsGAO-19-716T: Published: Sep 18, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 18, 2019.
Jun 20, 2019
-
NASA Commercial Crew Program:
Schedule Uncertainty Persists for Start of Operational Missions to the International Space StationGAO-19-504: Published: Jun 20, 2019. Publicly Released: Jun 20, 2019.
Jun 19, 2019
-
NASA Human Space Exploration:
Persistent Delays and Cost Growth Reinforce Concerns over Management of ProgramsGAO-19-377: Published: Jun 19, 2019. Publicly Released: Jun 19, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here
Explore our Key Issues on Space
Explore our other Key Issues here
