Systemwide Education Reform: Federal Leadership Could Facilitate District-Level Efforts

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on national systemwide educational reform, focusing on the similarities and differences between federal reform efforts and district reform experiences.

Recommendations

Matter for Congressional Consideration

Matter	Status	Comments
Congress may wish to encourage district-level systemwide reform by enacting legislation supporting efforts to develop voluntary high national and state content standards and support development of exemplary assessment methods appropriate to those standards. Standards developed in a process that includes representatives of districts and schools, as well as state and national educators, may hold the most promise for being useful at the local level.	Closed – Implemented	Goals 2000 passed March 31, 1994--legislation providing support for development of voluntary national and state content standards, with appropriate representatives developing the standards.
Congress may wish to encourage district-level systemwide reform by enacting legislation to ensure the availability of technical assistance and professional development to districts implementing or seeking to implement systemwide reform. Professional development here has a broad meaning, including training about reform, participation in developing the reform, and training in instructional techniques and use of new assessments.	Closed – Implemented	Goals 2000, passed March 31, 1994, ensured that technical assistance be provided to states and districts seeking to implement systematic reform.
Congress may wish to encourage district-level systemwide reform by enacting legislation to make existing federal categorical programs more conducive to systemwide reform. Many options exist for changing programs. Congress could allow waivers of program requirements or give priority for grants to applicants serving targeted groups in the context of systemwide reform. In making these or other changes, such as those recommended by recent studies of Chapter 1, provision should be made to ensure the needs of at-risk students are met.	Closed – Implemented	Goals 2000, passed March 31, 1994, has flexibility provisions incorporated for programs.
Congress may wish to direct the Secretary of Education to disseminate information about: (1) promising district-level models of systemwide reform (standards, assessments, curricula) for other districts to use as a starting point, modifying them as necessary for local needs; and (2) supporting development of networks among districts implementing or seeking to implement systemwide reform.	Closed – Implemented	Goals 2000, passed March 31, 1994, provides for the Department to disseminate about promising programs.
Congress may wish to direct the Secretary of Education to review the scope and functions of the federal research centers, laboratories, and technical assistance centers to determine the extent to which they could assist in systemwide reform efforts, particularly in setting standards, developing curriculum and assessment methods based on the new standards, and designing professional development.	Closed – Implemented	Congress has directed the Department to study the function of research centers and labs--this study is being directed by the National Academy of Sciences.

See All 5 Recommendations

Full Report

Full Report (44 pages)

Office of Public Affairs

Chuck Young

Managing Director

youngc1@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

Topics

Education

Educational standardsFederal aid to localitiesstate relationsPublic schoolsSchool districtsSecondary school studentslocal relationsTeacher educationStudentsTeachers