Medical Licensing By Endorsement:
Requirements Differ for Graduates of Foreign and U.S. Medical Schools
HRD-90-120: Published: May 17, 1990. Publicly Released: May 17, 1990.
Additional Materials:
- Full Report:
Contact:
Pursuant to a legislative request, GAO reviewed state requirements for medical licensure by endorsements to determine whether any state endorsement requirements discriminated against graduates of foreign medical schools.
GAO found that: (1) U.S. schools were accredited by the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME), but there was often no corresponding organization for foreign countries, which made it more difficult to assess the educational backgrounds and credentials of foreign school graduates; (2) the six state medical licensing boards used similar standards for foreign and U.S. medical graduates to determine whether endorsement applicants' medical education was acceptable; (3) five of the six states that GAO reviewed had documentation requirements related to clerkships that applied only to foreign school graduates; (4) documentation requirements posed more difficulty to foreign school graduates; (5) officials of the six state boards believed that such problems affected only a small percentage of endorsement applicants; (6) organizations representing foreign graduates believed that they should not be required to provide documentation other than that required of U.S. graduates; and (7) Federal State Medical Board and American Medical Association officials believed that states should establish standards and requirements to ensure competency, at their own discretion. GAO also found that: (1) examination requirements for graduates of U.S. medical schools were different in most states from those for graduates of foreign medical schools; (2) over 30 state medical licensing boards required more years of accredited U.S. or Canadian postgraduate training for foreign medical school graduates than for U.S. graduates seeking licensure; and (3) organizations representing foreign medical school graduates were opposed to postgraduate training requirements.
Jan 27, 2021
-
Higher Education:
IRS and Education Could Better Address Risks Associated with Some For-Profit College ConversionsGAO-21-89: Published: Dec 31, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 27, 2021.
Jan 19, 2021
-
Higher Education:
Department of Education Should Further Assess College Access Grant ProgramsGAO-21-5: Published: Dec 17, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 19, 2021.
Jan 11, 2021
-
K-12 Education:
Observations on States' School Improvement EffortsGAO-21-199: Published: Jan 11, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 11, 2021.
Dec 10, 2020
-
Higher Education:
Children's Savings Account Programs Can Help Families Build Savings and Envision CollegeGAO-21-10: Published: Dec 10, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2020.
Nov 19, 2020
-
Distance Learning:
Challenges Providing Services to K-12 English Learners and Students with Disabilities during COVID-19GAO-21-43: Published: Nov 19, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 19, 2020.
Oct 15, 2020
-
Data Security:
Recent K-12 Data Breaches Show That Students Are Vulnerable to HarmGAO-20-644: Published: Sep 15, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 15, 2020.
Oct 14, 2020
-
Disaster Recovery:
COVID-19 Pandemic Intensifies Disaster Recovery Challenges for K-12 SchoolsGAO-21-62R: Published: Oct 14, 2020. Publicly Released: Oct 14, 2020.
Sep 29, 2020
-
Federal Student Loans:
Supplemental Data on Income and Family Size Information for Income-Driven Repayment PlansGAO-20-591R: Published: Sep 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 29, 2020.
Aug 27, 2020
-
Native American Youth:
Agencies Incorporated Almost All Leading Practices When Assessing Grant Programs That Could Prevent or Address Delinquency [Reissued with revisions on Aug. 27, 2020.]GAO-20-600: Published: Aug 6, 2020. Publicly Released: Aug 6, 2020.
Jul 24, 2020
-
K-12 Education:
School Districts Need Better Information to Help Improve Access for People with DisabilitiesGAO-20-448: Published: Jun 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here