Managing for Results:

Regulatory Agencies Identified Significant Barriers to Focusing on Results

GGD-97-83: Published: Jun 24, 1997. Publicly Released: Jun 24, 1997.

Additional Materials:


L. Nye Stevens
(202) 512-2637


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO reviewed five regulatory agencies' efforts to implement the provisions of the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993, focusing on the: (1) five agencies' strategic goals and related program performance measures as well as selected employee performance standards as of January 1, 1997; (2) extent to which agency officials and GAO believed that these goals, program performance measures, and employee performance standards focused on results; and (3) aids and barriers that officials in the agencies said they faced in attempting to focus on results.

GAO noted that: (1) as would be expected in the early stages of implementing a new and difficult initiative, GAO observed that some of the five regulatory agencies were further along in the development of strategic goals, program performance measures, and employee performance standards than others; (2) the agencies also varied in the degree to which their goals, associated sets of program performance measures, and employee performance standards that were in use as of January 1, 1997, focused on results as judged by both agency officials and GAO; (3) in this regard, it is important to note that although GPRA was intended to encourage agencies to focus their goals and measures on results, the Act does not require that all of an agency's goals or performance measures be explicitly results-oriented; (4) similarly, the President's directive to orient frontline regulators' performance standards toward results does not appear to require that every standard be results-oriented; (5) there were differences in the extent to which agency officials characterized their goals, program performance measures, and employee performance standards as "results-oriented" and the extent to which GAO did; (6) in general, agencies frequently concluded that their goals, measures, and standards were more results-oriented than GAO did; (7) at the broader and more conceptual level of strategic goals, there were relatively few differences between agency officials' assessments of the extent of results-orientation and GAO's; (8) in enacting GPRA, Congress realized that the transition to results-oriented management would not be easy; (9) for that reason, the Act provided for a phased approach to implementation, during which time agencies have been able to identify the obstacles that need to be overcome and some factors they found helpful; (10) the factor that agency officials most commonly said aided the establishment of a results-orientation in the agencies was the enactment of GPRA; (11) although agency officials identified some aids to focusing their agencies on results, they cited numerous barriers to their efforts to establish results oriented goals and measures; (12) these barriers included significant problems in identifying and collecting the data they needed to demonstrate their agencies' results; (13) agencies also cited as a barrier the fact that the diverse and complex factors affect agencies' results, and their lack of control or influence over those factors; and (14) these barriers suggest that the implementation of GPRA in a regulatory environment may prove extremely difficult in some cases.

Aug 2, 2018

Jul 30, 2018

Jul 26, 2018

Jul 25, 2018

Jul 23, 2018

Jul 18, 2018

Jul 17, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here