Skip to main content

Office of Personnel Management: Better Performance Information Needed

GGD-90-44 Published: Feb 07, 1990. Publicly Released: Feb 07, 1990.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO assessed the Office of Personnel Management's (OPM) use of performance measures and standards to manage its service delivery to individuals seeking federal employment and federal employees, retirees, and dependents.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Office of Personnel Management The Director, OPM, should establish a more comprehensive and strategic approach to the development and use of performance measures and standards. Such an approach would require determining who OPM customers are, deciding which services provided to those customers should be routinely tracked at the directorate level, and developing the measures and standards needed to assess performance in those services. In following this approach, OPM needs to consider the cost of developing measures and whether precise, quantitative measures are needed in all areas. Further, consideration should be given to the need to have information on various services and outputs, not just the 24 identified in this report.
Closed – Implemented
An examination of the OPM new planning and budgeting system showed that, for the large part, measures and standards have been developed for key services. The system is dynamic and will change as key services change, thus it is expected that some measures will be in development at all times.
Office of Personnel Management The Director, OPM, should establish a more comprehensive and strategic approach to the development and use of performance measures and standards. Such an approach would require developing a flexible performance reporting system for the directorate level that will highlight areas needing attention. Such a reporting system should ensure that the director is routinely made aware of performance in all areas of importance to good management of operations and customer service. Further, the reporting system need not report all performance dimensions of all key services on a frequent basis, but should be tailored to the current needs of top management at any point in time.
Closed – Implemented
OPM, in response to the GAO report, established and implemented a quarterly performance standards report requirement for each program area.
Office of Personnel Management The Director, OPM, should establish a more comprehensive and strategic approach to the development and use of performance measure and standards. Such an approach would require making greater use of organizational performance information in holding Senior Executive Service (SES) and general managements accountable by specifying, in their annual workplans, specific key services and their performance expectations.
Closed – Implemented
OPM, in response to the GAO report, established a new Planning and Budgeting System. The system requires establishing organizational performance goals (quality, timeliness, efficiency, and customer satisfaction), identifying certain goals as priority, and including these in SES managers' workplans.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

AccountabilityClaims processingFederal employeesHealth insurancePerformance measuresPerformance appraisalProductivity in governmentQuality assurancePerformance measurementCustomer satisfaction