Senior Executive Service:
Opportunities for Selected Agencies to Improve Their Career Reassignment Processes
GAO-20-559: Published: Sep 16, 2020. Publicly Released: Sep 16, 2020.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-6806
RosenbergM@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Agencies may reassign career, federal employees in the Senior Executive Service (SES). But reassignments must meet certain requirements to protect these executives from arbitrary decisions.
Protections include two 120-day periods when agencies can't reassign SES members who don't choose to be moved. The moratoriums begin when a new agency head or a new, non-career supervisor (political appointee) is appointed.
Selected agencies couldn't always show that executives voluntarily accepted the reassignments, particularly when a non-career supervisor took over.
We recommend that the Office of Personnel Management better oversee SES reassignments.

Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-6806
RosenbergM@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
The Senior Executive Service (SES) was designed, in part, to enable agencies to assign and reassign career SES members to best accomplish the agency's mission. When reassigning career SES members, agencies must meet requirements to protect career SES members from arbitrary and capricious actions. These protections include two 120-day moratoriums when agencies cannot involuntarily reassign career SES members, although voluntary reassignments are permissible, if certain requirements are met. The moratorium periods begin upon the permanent appointment of a (1) new agency head or (2) career SES member's new, noncareer supervisor (e.g., a political appointee).
Selected agencies GAO reviewed—the Departments of Commerce (Commerce), Energy, Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Interior (Interior)—varied in the extent to which they reassigned career SES members during moratoriums. Agencies most often initiated these reassignments to address agency-specific priorities, including filling senior-level vacancies and succession planning.
Reassignments Made within 120-Day Moratoriums at Selected Agencies, Fiscal Years 2017 through 2019
|
Selected agency |
New agency head moratorium |
New, noncareer supervisor moratorium |
|
Department of Commerce |
8 |
1 |
|
Department of Energy |
10 |
6 |
|
Department of Housing and Urban Development |
0 |
5 |
|
Department of the Interiora |
10 |
1 |
|
Subtotal |
28 |
13 |
|
Total |
41 |
Source: GAO analysis of selected agency documentation. I GAO-20-559
aIncludes reassignments from October 30, 2017, through September 30, 2019, to avoid duplicating work previously performed by the department's Office of Inspector General.
Selected agencies could not always demonstrate that they met requirements for career SES reassignments, especially for reassignments during the new, noncareer supervisor moratorium. Specifically:
Commerce did not maintain required documentation,
HUD did not seek written waivers from the career SES member, and
Interior's process did not address how to make reassignments during the moratorium.
As a result, they could not always show that career SES member reassignments during moratorium periods were voluntary. Each agency made or was making improvements to their career SES reassignment process, but in some cases need to make further process changes to fully address reassignment requirements.
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is responsible for the governmentwide management of the SES. While OPM has oversight authority, it has not monitored career SES reassignments, or required agencies to take corrective actions. As a result, OPM is likely missing opportunities to correct career SES reassignments that were contrary to requirements.
Why GAO Did This Study
The SES was created in 1978 as a corps of federal executives selected for their leadership qualifications. They serve in key positions just below the top presidential appointees. Federal agencies have broad authority to reassign career SES members, but these reassignments must meet certain requirements. GAO was asked to provide information on the reassignments of career SES members. Among other things, this report examines (1) career SES reassignments at selected agencies within the moratoriums on involuntary reassignments from fiscal years 2017 through 2019, (2) the extent to which selected agencies followed requirements, and (3) OPM's monitoring of career SES reassignments.
GAO analyzed personnel records, reviewed agency processes, and interviewed agency officials from four selected agencies that were among those with the highest percentage of career SES members reassigned in fiscal year 2017. GAO also reviewed requirements and OPM guidance, and interviewed OPM officials.
What GAO Recommends
GAO is making four recommendations, including one each to Commerce, HUD, and Interior to improve their career SES reassignment processes, to which each agency agreed. GAO also recommends OPM monitor career SES reassignments. OPM disagreed, but GAO maintains that oversight is needed, as discussed in the report.
For more information, contact Michelle B. Rosenberg at (202) 512-6806 or RosenbergM@gao.gov.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Open

Comments: In its comments on a draft of this report, Commerce concurred with the recommendation and indicated it will take steps to implement the recommendation. We will continue to monitor Commerce's progress.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Commerce, in consultation with the department-level Executive Resources Board and Office of Executive Resources, should fully implement policy and guidance in development that require the bureaus to maintain career SES reassignment-related documentation in the SES member's Official Personnel Folder, and to provide those documents to the Office of Executive Resources for review and approval before making career SES reassignments. (Recommendation 1)
Agency Affected: Department of Commerce
Status: Open

Comments: In its comments on the draft of the report, HUD said it finalized standard operating procedures for making career SES reassignments, and thus believes it has addressed our recommendation. We will follow up with the department to assess whether its actions fully address the recommendation.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development should establish a date to finalize its draft standard operating procedures for conducting career SES reassignments, and ensure that the final procedures include (1) obtaining a written moratorium waiver from the career SES member before making the reassignment during the new, noncareer supervisor moratorium, and (2) retaining the waiver in the member's Official Personnel Folder. (Recommendation 2)
Agency Affected: Department of Housing and Urban Development
Status: Closed - Implemented

Comments: In its written comments on the draft report, Interior stated that it had updated its standard operating procedures (SOP) to include career SES reassignments during the new, noncareer supervisor moratorium. On October 1, 2020, Interior provided us with the revised SOP, dated July 2020. Interior also provided us with a July 9, 2020, email from its Office of Human Capital Director (Executive Resources Division) to the bureaus' Executive Resources team, notifying them of the revised SOP, the material changes made to their procedures regarding career SES reassignments, and where the SOP in its entirety can be found. Interior's revised procedures require that if the career SES member's supervisor is a noncareer appointee, there must be verification that the supervisor has been in place for at least 120 days before submitting the reassignment request to Interior's Executive Resources Board for approval. These reassignments would be after the 120-day moratorium on involuntary reassignments of career SES members following appointment of a new, noncareer supervisor. During this moratorium, agencies have to obtain a waiver from the career SES member to make a reassignment. With this change in procedures, Interior will not approve career SES reassignments during the new, noncareer supervisor moratorium period, and therefore waivers would not be required.
Recommendation: The Secretary of the Interior should update its career SES reassignment process to document agency processes for making reassignments during the new, noncareer supervisor moratorium period and ensure that those processes are in accordance with the requirement related to waivers of the moratorium period. (Recommendation 3)
Agency Affected: Department of the Interior
Status: Open

Comments: OPM did not concur with our recommendation. In its comment on a draft of the report, OPM said it relies on federal agencies to comply with provisions governing SES reassignments. OPM further stated that it has chosen not to make reassignments a focus of its enforcement efforts, in light of scarce resources and other mandates OPM is required to meet. However, for reasons discussed in the report, we maintain that OPM should use its oversight authority to ensure agencies' reassignments of SES staff are consistent with requirements. We will continue to monitor OPM's progress.
Recommendation: The Acting Director of the Office of Personnel Management should use OPM's oversight authority to monitor career SES reassignments to ensure that federal agencies meet requirements contained in statute or regulation, and follow OPM's related guidance. In situations where OPM finds that an agency has taken a career SES reassignment action contrary to these requirements, it should use its authority to require the agency to take corrective action, as appropriate. (Recommendation 4)
Agency Affected: Office of Personnel Management
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Feb 25, 2020
-
State Department:
Additional Steps Are Needed to Identify Potential Barriers to DiversityGAO-20-237: Published: Jan 27, 2020. Publicly Released: Feb 25, 2020.
Dec 30, 2019
-
Office of Congressional Workplace Rights:
Using Key Management Practices Would Help to Fully Implement Statutory RequirementsGAO-20-222: Published: Dec 30, 2019. Publicly Released: Dec 30, 2019.
Oct 10, 2019
-
Department of Veterans Affairs:
Improved Succession Planning Would Help Address Long-Standing Workforce ProblemsGAO-20-15: Published: Oct 10, 2019. Publicly Released: Oct 10, 2019.
Oct 2, 2019
-
Defense Workforce:
Steps Needed to Identify Acquisition Training Needs for Non-Acquisition Personnel [Reissued with revisions on Oct. 2, 2019.]GAO-19-556: Published: Sep 5, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 5, 2019.
Sep 25, 2019
-
Federal Workforce:
Talent Management Strategies to Help Agencies Better Compete in a Tight Labor MarketGAO-19-723T: Published: Sep 25, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 25, 2019.
Sep 11, 2019
-
USAID Reform:
Efforts Address Most Key Practices but Could Improve in Performance Assessment and Strategic Workforce PlanningGAO-19-609: Published: Sep 11, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 11, 2019.
Aug 15, 2019
-
Defense Acquisition Workforce:
DOD Increased Use of Human Capital Flexibilities but Could Improve MonitoringGAO-19-509: Published: Aug 15, 2019. Publicly Released: Aug 15, 2019.
Jul 30, 2019
-
Human Capital:
Improving Federal Recruiting and Hiring EffortsGAO-19-696T: Published: Jul 30, 2019. Publicly Released: Jul 30, 2019.
May 23, 2019
-
Commercial Space Transportation:
Improvements to FAA's Workforce Planning Needed to Prepare for the Industry's Anticipated GrowthGAO-19-437: Published: May 23, 2019. Publicly Released: May 23, 2019.
Apr 29, 2019
-
Federal Workforce:
Key Talent Management Strategies for Agencies to Better Meet Their MissionsGAO-19-181: Published: Mar 28, 2019. Publicly Released: Apr 29, 2019.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here


Explore our Key Issues on Human Capital