Federal Contracting:
Awards to Mid-Sized Businesses and Options for Increasing Their Opportunities
GAO-19-523: Published: Aug 20, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 19, 2019.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-8678
shearw@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Some federal contracts are set aside for small businesses (categorized by their number of employees or their revenue). But what happens when these businesses grow to become mid-size? We looked at how many small businesses grew to be mid-size, as well as options for increasing federal contracting opportunities for mid-sized businesses.
We found that, between 2008 and 2017, very few small businesses (about 2.5%) grew to mid-size and continued to receive some type of federal contract. However, stakeholders told us that implementing a mid-sized business set-aside would likely reduce opportunities for small businesses.
The United States Capitol with cash superimposed on the background
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
Contact:
(202) 512-8678
shearw@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
What GAO Found
From fiscal year 2008 through 2017, very few small businesses that were awarded limited competition (set-aside) contracts grew to be mid-sized and continued to receive contracts. (GAO defined mid-sized businesses as having revenue or employees up to five times above the small business size standard.)
Of the 5,339 small businesses awarded set-aside contracts in fiscal year 2008 and awarded any sort of federal contract (including set-aside or competed) in 2013, 104 became mid-sized by fiscal year 2013.
Of those 104 businesses, 23 remained mid-sized through 2017 and won 75 contracts. Another three businesses became large and won six contracts.
Extent to Which 104 Businesses Awarded Set-Aside Contracts in Fiscal Year (FY) 2008 and That Grew to Mid-Sized by FY2013 Received Contracts in FY2014–2017, by Size
Business size in FY2014–2017 |
Number of businesses |
Number of contracts (FY2014–2017) |
Small |
17 |
51 |
Mid-sized |
23 |
75 |
Large |
3 |
6 |
Size varied |
|
|
Mid-sized/large |
5 |
34 |
Small/large |
1 |
4 |
Small/mid-sized |
28 |
204 |
Small/mid-sized/large |
3 |
64 |
Did not receive any contracts |
24 |
0 |
Total |
104 |
438 |
Source: GAO analysis of Federal Procurement Data System-Next Generation data. | GAO-19-523
Note: Size can vary because businesses can be awarded contracts in different industries and be considered small in one industry but not in another.
Options for increasing federal contracting opportunities for mid-sized businesses that GAO identified in its review include establishing a separate set-aside category, changing consideration of past contracting performance, and modifying size standards. Stakeholders told GAO some options would help mid-sized businesses more than others.
While a set-aside category for mid-sized businesses would increase opportunities for mid-sized businesses, stakeholders generally believed it could decrease opportunities for small businesses and increase agency burden (time and costs to implement the set-aside).
Requiring agencies to consider businesses' past performance as subcontractors or as part of a team would help both mid-sized and growing small businesses by making them more competitive for contracts.
Stakeholders said raising size standards based on revenue would allow a limited number of mid-sized businesses to be eligible for set-asides again, but not help the vast majority of mid-sized businesses.
Why GAO Did This Study
Small businesses that receive federal contracts set aside for them may outgrow the size standards the Small Business Administration (SBA) uses to define small businesses. (Size standards vary by industry and generally are based on employees or revenue.) Questions have been raised about the extent to which mid-sized businesses can compete with large businesses for federal contracts.
GAO was asked to provide information on federal contracting opportunities for mid-sized businesses. This report analyzes, among other objectives, (1) the extent to which small businesses grew to mid-sized and continued to receive federal contracts and (2) options for increasing contracting opportunities for mid-sized businesses.
GAO analyzed federal contracting data for fiscal years 2008–2017 (most recent and complete). In the absence of legal definitions of “mid-sized” and “large,” GAO multiplied relevant size standards for small businesses to arrive at parameters for mid-sized and large businesses for its analysis. GAO reviewed literature to identify options for increasing contracting opportunities and interviewed SBA officials and a nongeneralizable selection of 11 stakeholders—trade association representatives, researchers, and small business directors at three agencies with large obligations for small business contracts in fiscal year 2017—to obtain views on the options. SBA provided comments, which we addressed as appropriate.
For more information, contact William B. Shear at (202) 512-8678 or shearw@gao.gov.
Jan 19, 2021
-
Federal Rulemaking:
Selected EPA and HHS Regulatory Analyses Met Several Best Practices, but CMS Should Take Steps to Strengthen Its AnalysesGAO-21-151: Published: Dec 17, 2020. Publicly Released: Jan 19, 2021.
Jan 13, 2021
-
Department of Energy Contracting:
Improvements Needed to Ensure DOE Assesses Its Full Range of Contracting Fraud RisksGAO-21-44: Published: Jan 13, 2021. Publicly Released: Jan 13, 2021.
Dec 16, 2020
-
Data Governance:
Agencies Made Progress in Establishing Governance, but Need to Address Key MilestonesGAO-21-152: Published: Dec 16, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 16, 2020.
Dec 9, 2020
-
2020 Census:
The Bureau Concluded Field Work but Uncertainty about Data Quality, Accuracy, and Protection RemainsGAO-21-206R: Published: Dec 9, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 9, 2020.
Dec 3, 2020
-
2020 Census:
Census Bureau Needs to Assess Data Quality Concerns Stemming from Recent Design ChangesGAO-21-142: Published: Dec 3, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 3, 2020. -
2020 Census:
Census Bureau Needs to Ensure Transparency over Data QualityGAO-21-262T: Published: Dec 3, 2020. Publicly Released: Dec 3, 2020.
Nov 30, 2020
-
Federal Buying Power:
OMB Can Further Advance Category Management Initiative by Focusing on Requirements, Data, and TrainingGAO-21-40: Published: Nov 30, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 30, 2020.
Nov 24, 2020
-
Disaster Response:
Agencies Should Assess Contracting Workforce Needs and Purchase Card Fraud RiskGAO-21-42: Published: Nov 24, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 24, 2020.
Nov 23, 2020
-
Federal Contracting:
Actions Needed to Improve Department of Labor's Enforcement of Service Worker Wage ProtectionsGAO-21-11: Published: Oct 29, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 23, 2020.
Nov 18, 2020
-
Federal Telework:
Key Practices That Can Help Ensure the Success of Telework ProgramsGAO-21-238T: Published: Nov 18, 2020. Publicly Released: Nov 18, 2020.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here