Overseas Contingency Operations:

Alternatives Identified to the Approach to Fund War- Related Activities

GAO-19-211: Published: Jan 28, 2019. Publicly Released: Jan 28, 2019.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Elizabeth Field
(202) 512-2775
fielde1@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

The Department of Defense has received more than $1.8 trillion for war-related activities since 2001. Currently, Congress provides funds for both war-related activities and regular activities. DOD tracks the funds separately by using codes in its financial system.

We identified more ways to separate these funds:

Move costs that will endure beyond current war operations to the regular budget

Use language in the appropriations acts to specify the purpose of funds for war-related activities

Create separate appropriations accounts

Fund everything from the regular budget and reimburse for war-related activities from a transfer account

Army personnel secure a landing zone during combat operations in Afghanistan in November 2018

Photo of three soldiers kneeling and a helicopter in the background.

Photo of three soldiers kneeling and a helicopter in the background.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Elizabeth Field
(202) 512-2775
fielde1@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

What GAO Found

Selected Department of Defense (DOD) components use coding and other internal control activities to separately account for overseas contingency operations (OCO) and base amounts in their operation and maintenance (O&M) accounts during budget execution. To record and track OCO and base amounts separately, the military services, U.S. Special Operations Command, and the Defense Security Cooperation Agency use coding in their financial systems. These DOD components also have instituted some internal control activities to help ensure separation of OCO amounts. For example, Army and Defense Security Cooperation Agency officials stated that the financial systems they use incorporate system controls that automatically maintain the categories of funding, such as OCO, designated during allotment through subsequent actions to ensure the OCO coding remains throughout budget execution.

GAO identified at least four alternatives to the processes used to separate funding for DOD's OCO and base activities:

Move enduring costs to the base budget. DOD could request funding for enduring costs—costs that would continue in the absence of contingency operations—through its base budget rather than its OCO budget.

Use specific purpose language. Congress could use legally binding language in the annual DOD appropriations acts to specify the purposes—programs, projects and activities—for which OCO amounts may be obligated.

Create separate appropriation accounts. Congress could create separate appropriation accounts for OCO and base funding.

Use a transfer account. Congress could appropriate funds for OCO into a non-expiring transfer account. DOD would fund OCO with its base budget and later reimburse its base accounts using funds from a transfer account.

Implementing these alternatives would require Congress and DOD to take action in different phases of the budget process (see figure).

Alternatives for Funding for DOD's OCO and Base Activities in Phases of the Budget Process

Alternatives for Funding for DOD's OCO and Base Activities in Phases of the Budget Process

Each alternative includes tradeoffs that Congress and DOD would have to consider to strike the desired balance between agency flexibility and congressional control. The alternatives, and GAO's summary of their positive and negative aspects identified by questionnaire respondents, could be a reference for Congress and DOD as they consider potential changes to processes for separating the funding of amounts for OCO and base activities.

Why GAO Did This Study

Since 2001, DOD has received more than $1.8 trillion in OCO funds. DOD defines “contingency operations” as small, medium, or large-scale military operations, while “base” activities include operating support for installations, civilian pay, and other costs that would be incurred, regardless of contingency operations. Congress separately appropriates amounts for base and OCO activities into the same appropriation accounts and directs how funds are to be spent by designating amounts in conference reports or explanatory statements accompanying the annual appropriations acts.

The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018 included a provision for GAO to report on the feasibility of separating OCO expenditures from other DOD expenditures. This report (1) describes internal controls that selected DOD components use to separately account for OCO and base amounts during budget execution and (2) identifies and examines alternatives that Congress or DOD could use to separate funding for OCO and base activities.

GAO reviewed documentation of DOD internal controls for separating OCO and base amounts in the O&M account, interviewed financial management officials, and, among other things, conducted a literature review to identify alternatives that Congress or DOD could use to separate funding for OCO and base activities. Also, GAO administered a questionnaire to DOD and non-DOD officials to identify positive and negative aspects of these alternatives.

For more information, contact Elizabeth Field at (202) 512-2775 or fielde1@gao.gov.

Feb 21, 2019

Feb 15, 2019

Feb 14, 2019

Feb 7, 2019

Feb 6, 2019

Feb 5, 2019

Jan 31, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here