Quiet Zone Analyses and Inspections Could Be Improved
GAO-18-97: Published: Oct 31, 2017. Publicly Released: Oct 31, 2017.
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Version:
What GAO Found
GAO found that the benefits of quiet zones—–i.e., highway-rail at-grade crossings (grade crossings) where train horns are not sounded—have not been quantified and that the costs to establish quiet zones vary. The Federal Railroad Administration's (FRA) train horn regulations allow public authorities (e.g., cities or towns) the opportunity to establish quiet zones if they install safety measures that reduce risks associated with the absence of the train horn (see fig.). While GAO did not identify any research that has quantified the benefits of quiet zones, most stakeholders GAO interviewed said that these quiet zones provide benefits to communities, such as reducing noise or increasing economic development. According to FRA guidance, the factors that affect the costs to establish quiet zones can vary based on the number of grade crossings and types of safety measures used. Public authorities, which typically incur the costs and receive the benefits of quiet zones, must therefore decide whether the benefits of quiet zones exceed the costs.
Examples of the Federal Railroad Administration's Approved Quiet Zone Safety Measures
To evaluate the effectiveness of its train horn regulations, FRA has analyzed data on grade crossings in quiet zones and is transitioning to a formal process for inspecting quiet zones.
- Analyses: FRA's analyses showed grade crossings in quiet zones were generally as safe as they were when train horns were sounded. However, these analyses did not control for changes to grade crossings' characteristics over time—–e.g., train speeds or frequency. Such changes may decrease the analyses' reliability. A revised methodology that accounts for these changes could provide FRA with better information on the long-term effects of the train horn regulations, including the safety of quiet zones.
- Inspections: Recognizing the need for additional oversight, FRA has taken steps to formalize its process for inspecting quiet zones. FRA has primarily relied on public authorities to oversee quiet zones and ensure compliance with the train horn regulations, in addition to informal inspections by FRA's Grade Crossing Managers. In September 2017, FRA began conducting formal inspections of quiet zones using Grade Crossing Inspectors. However, FRA has not developed guidance for how inspections are to be conducted, including how frequently inspections are to be performed or what should be examined. Without guidance, FRA cannot ensure that inspections are being conducted consistently across FRA's eight regions.
Why GAO Did This Study
Accidents at grade crossings are a major source of fatalities in the railroad industry. FRA—the federal agency responsible for providing regulatory oversight of grade-crossing safety—–issued regulations on the use of train horns in 2005. Railroads generally support sounding the horn, whereas, communities often support quiet zones to reduce noise.
Congress included a provision in statute for GAO to examine FRA's train horn regulations, including those on quiet zones. Among other things, this report: (1) describes benefits and costs of quiet zones, and (2) examines how FRA evaluates the effectiveness of its train horn regulations. GAO analyzed FRA's documentation on quiet zones, including FRA's train horn regulations and 2011 and 2013 studies on quiet zone safety; reviewed literature; and interviewed FRA program officials in headquarters, Grade Crossing Managers in FRA's 8 regions, and a nongeneralizable sample of another 32 stakeholders from 6 states, railroads, public authorities, and private industry consulting firms. State and public authorities were selected based on the number of quiet zones, geographic diversity, and FRA's recommendations.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends that FRA: (1) revise its methodology for analyzing the safety of quiet zones, and (2) develop guidance on conducting quiet zone inspections. The Department of Transportation partially concurred with the first recommendation, saying it would consider it, and fully concurred with the second. GAO continues to believe changes to the methodology are needed, as discussed in the report.
For more information, contact Susan Fleming at (202) 512-2834 or email@example.com.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Comments: The Department of Transportation concurred with the recommendation and said the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) would contract with statistical experts to conduct a study and analyze alternative ways to evaluate the safety of quiet zones. The study will include relevant changes over time, changes in train and automotive traffic and speeds, and changes to the physical and operating characteristics of grade crossings. Based on the results of the study, FRA will update its methodology for analyzing the safety of quiet zones. The department decided to competitively bid the study work and plans to complete the study in May 2019.
Recommendation: The Administrator of FRA should revise the methodology for the analysis of safety in quiet zones to take into account relevant changes over time--including changes in train and automotive traffic, or in the physical characteristics of the grade crossing. (Recommendation 1)
Agency Affected: Department of Transportation: Federal Railroad Administration
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is responsible for providing regulatory oversight of the safety of both freight and passenger railroads. FRA also has specific responsibilities related to the safety of grade crossings, including issuing regulations regarding the use of train horns at grade crossings. Grade crossings are where railroad tracks cross roads. Federal regulations require that train horns be sounded in advance of all public grade crossings. However, the regulations also provide an opportunity for public authorities to reduce the effects of noise associated with the train horns by establishing quiet zones. In 2017, GAO reported that, to evaluate the effectiveness of its train horn regulations, FRA had analyzed data on grade crossings in quiet zones and was transitioning to a formal process for inspecting quiet zones. Recognizing the need for additional oversight, FRA had taken steps to formalize its process for inspecting quiet zones. FRA had primarily relied on public authorities to oversee quiet zones and ensure compliance with the train horn regulations, in addition to informal inspections by FRA's Grade Crossing Managers. In September 2017, FRA began conducting formal inspections of quiet zones using Grade Crossing Inspectors. However, FRA had not developed guidance for how inspections were to be conducted, including how frequently inspections were to be performed or what should be examined. Without this guidance, FRA could not ensure that inspections were being conducted consistently across FRA's eight regional offices. As a result, GAO recommended that FRA develop guidance for inspectors on the nature and frequency of quiet zone inspections. In 2018, GAO confirmed that FRA issued guidance for inspection of quiet zones that addressed both the frequency and the nature of such inspections. For example, the guidance specifies that new quiet zones are to be inspected within 60 days of the date they are established and existing quiet zones are to be inspected every 3 years, at a minimum, to verify they continue to comply with federal regulations. The guidance also includes a quiet zone inspection checklist that inspectors are expected to complete during the quiet zone inspection. The checklist includes information such as the location of the quiet zone, the type of grade crossings in the zone (e.g. public highway-rail, private highway-rail), and safety improvements in the quiet zone. It also includes information on inspector recommendations for safety improvements and corrective actions that are needed. FRA distributed both the checklist and the instructions for preparing the checklist to applicable staff in August 2018. These actions substantially clarify when inspections are to be performed and the type of information to be collected during inspections. It should also significantly improve the consistency of information collected across FRA regional offices and better facilitate nationwide analyses of both quiet zone compliance with regulations and types of problems being experienced at quiet zones. With these actions, FRA has now reasonable assurance that inspections are being conducted consistently across FRA's eight regions and as FRA intends.
Recommendation: The Administrator of FRA should develop guidance for Inspectors on the nature and frequency of quiet zone inspections. (Recommendation 2)
Agency Affected: Department of Transportation: Federal Railroad Administration