FAA Should Examine How to Appropriately Regulate Space Support Vehicles
GAO-17-100: Published: Nov 25, 2016. Publicly Released: Nov 25, 2016.
What GAO Found
Company officials GAO interviewed identified potential uses for “space support vehicles”—which include a variety of aircraft from high-performance jets to balloons and the aircraft portion of a hybrid launch systems (a vehicle that contains elements of both an aircraft and a rocket-powered launch vehicle)—but the size of the market for these uses is unclear. Company officials said they plan to use space support vehicles to train spaceflight participants and to conduct research in reduced gravity environments. For example, some company officials said they would like to use high-performance jets to train future spaceflight participants by exposing them to physiological and psychological effects encountered in spaceflight. Other company officials said they would like to use space support vehicles to research how objects or people react in reduced gravity environments. It is difficult to know the size of the market for spaceflight training and research as GAO found no studies on these markets. However, stakeholders said they expect interest in research to increase.
Some company officials said the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) regulatory framework presents a market challenge because companies cannot get FAA approval to use the aircraft they would like to use to carry passengers or cargo for compensation, thus limiting their ability to operate in the market. FAA's Office of Aviation Safety (AVS) regulates aircraft that companies would like to use as space support vehicles by issuing standard and experimental certificates that help ensure safety. While officials from two companies GAO interviewed have received standard aircraft certification for their space support vehicle, others said the standard certification process is lengthy and not designed for the type of vehicles they would like to use, such as unique, single-production aircraft or retired military jets. In addition, FAA regulations do not allow companies to receive compensation for carrying people or property on an aircraft operating under an experimental certificate. As a result, some of the companies we interviewed have training operations in other countries where they can receive payment for the activity. Further, FAA's Office of Commercial Space Transportation (AST)—the office that regulates commercial space activities—is only authorized to regulate commercial space activities, such as launches, focusing on the safety of third parties. According to FAA officials, a statutory or regulatory change would be needed to allow companies to use space support vehicles that do not meet AVS's standard certification requirements for compensation.
Stakeholders GAO interviewed have mixed views on how FAA should regulate space support vehicles; some companies believe the current regulatory approach is appropriate, while others believe the system should be changed in the face of new technology and commercial space development. While FAA has taken steps to assess the licensing and permitting process for hybrid launch vehicles, it has not assessed whether space support vehicles are needed and if it should propose changes that would accommodate all aircraft that could be used as space support vehicles. Thus, some U.S. company officials said they are delaying investments in space support vehicles, and therefore, it is uncertain if they will be able to use them to meet the future needs of the commercial space transportation industry.
Why GAO Did This Study
As the commercial space transportation industry has grown significantly in the last decade, a related industry has emerged that plans to complement the commercial space industry by using vehicles called space support vehicles to conduct space-related activities, but not launch into space.
The U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act of 2015 includes a provision for GAO to review the uses for space support vehicles and services and any barriers to their use. This report addresses stakeholder views on (1) potential uses for space support vehicles, (2) challenges that companies may face when attempting to use these vehicles, and (3) how these vehicles should be regulated. GAO reviewed prior GAO and industry reports, relevant laws and regulations, and interviewed officials on two proposals for regulating space support vehicles. GAO interviewed officials at FAA and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and 37 legal experts and stakeholders from industry organizations, launch companies, space support companies, and spaceports—identified by agency and industry officials.
What GAO Recommends
The Secretary of the Department of Transportation (DOT) should direct the FAA Administrator to fully examine and document whether the FAA's current regulatory framework is appropriate for space support vehicles and, if not, suggest legislative or regulatory changes, or both, as applicable. DOT provided technical comments; however, it did not comment on the recommendation at this time.
For more information, contact Gerald L. Dillingham, Ph.D. at (202) 512-2834 or email@example.com.
Recommendation for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: As the commercial space transportation industry has grown significantly in the last decade, a related industry has emerged that plans to complement the commercial space industry by using vehicles called space support vehicles to conduct space-related activities, but not launch into space. In 2016, GAO reported that some launch and space support company officials said the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) regulatory framework presents a market challenge because companies cannot get FAA approval to use the aircraft they would like to use to carry passengers or cargo for compensation, thus limiting their ability to operate in the market. FAA's current regulatory framework applies to aircraft; however, the aircraft that some companies would like to use to provide space support services do not fit into this framework. As stakeholders recognized, a change in regulatory regimes may impact safety and streamline the regulatory process. The U.S. Commercial Space Launch Competitiveness Act neither required nor has FAA developed a proposed regulatory framework. However, federal internal control standards state that federal agencies should identify, analyze, and respond to significant changes that could impact the internal control system. While FAA has started considering this issue, especially for hybrid launch systems, it had not determined if space support vehicles are needed to meet the potential research, training, and other needs of the commercial space industry nor fully examined its current regulations as they relate to space support vehicles and determined and documented the results of its assessment. Therefore, GAO recommended that FAA examine and document whether the current regulatory framework is appropriate for aircraft that could be considered space support vehicles, and if not, suggest legislation or regulatory changes, or both, as applicable. In 2018, GAO confirmed that FAA had issued a report documenting its recommended approach to enable non-launch flights of aircraft that are launch vehicles, reentry vehicles, or a component of a launch or reentry vehicle, which could be considered a space support vehicle. To implement this approach, FAA stated that a legislative change may be required. For other types of aircraft that could be considered space support vehicles-such as retired military jets used for spaceflight participant training-FAA examined the issue and determined that it would need to amend existing regulations to allow the operator of an aircraft with a special airworthiness certification in the experimental category to operate an aircraft for the purpose of conducting a space support vehicle flight or carrying people or property for compensation or hire. Additionally, in October 2018, Congress passed the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, which among other things, defines space support vehicle and space support vehicle flight, and enables companies operating these vehicles to receive compensation under their experimental certification. As a result of these actions, FAA has clarified its regulatory approach to space support vehicles and Congress has allowed for space support vehicle compensation. Through these actions the industry is in a better position to understand whether and under what regulatory authority their business plans for space support vehicles are allowed.
Recommendation: To respond to changes in the aviation and commercial space-transportation industries, the Secretary of Transportation should direct the FAA Administrator to fully examine and document whether the current regulatory framework is appropriate for aircraft that could be considered space support vehicles, and if not, suggest legislation or develop regulatory changes, or both, as applicable.
Agency Affected: Department of Transportation