Skip to main content

Airport Noise Grants: FAA Needs to Better Ensure Project Eligibility and Improve Strategic Goal and Performance Measures

GAO-12-890 Published: Sep 12, 2012. Publicly Released: Sep 12, 2012.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

The number of people in the United States exposed to significant airport noise has steadily declined from roughly 7 million people in 1975 to about 309,000 today. This change reflects large decreases in the size of areas that are exposed to significant airport noise and is primarily due to improvements in aircraft technology.

Since 1982, FAA has provided $5.8 billion in Airport Improvement Program noise grants to 481 airports for residential and public building noise insulation and land acquisition, among other project types. The majority of grants went to airports that voluntarily undertook Noise Compatibility Programs (NCP). While these funds benefitted thousands of people, GAO identified two areas of concern regarding FAA’s enforcement of project eligibility criteria that creates a risk that some undetermined amount of grant funds may have gone to projects that do not meet FAA’s project eligibility criteria. First, FAA does not always require airports to maintain updated and accurate noise exposure maps to define eligible project areas. For example, half of the noise exposure maps—which show the areas around an airport that are exposed to significant airport noise and are a key element in determining project eligibility—are from the 1990s or earlier. For an airport to receive a noise grant, program criteria generally require that such maps are updated every 5 years, but nine airports received $87.6 million in grants in fiscal years 2010 to 2011 based on maps that predate 2000. Second, FAA has inconsistently implemented requirements that limit residential noise insulation projects to homes with interior noise levels above an established threshold. In the absence of FAA enforcement, airports have little incentive to update maps and limit residential treatment because doing so might eliminate planned projects expected by the public. Concurrent to GAO’s review, FAA issued new guidance that should substantially address this risk if effectively implemented. Further, the results of noise grants are not linked to FAA’s strategic noise reduction goal and measurement approach. For example, the goal does not include the results of noise insulation of homes and schools. As a result, there is insufficient performance information about the effects of noise grants and the extent to which noise exposure remains a constraint on airport growth.

There has been an increase in the estimated cost of planned noise mitigation projects in FAA’s 2011 National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems report to Congress, but a number of indicators point to a future decline in demand for grants for noise projects. Specifically, the 2011 report, compared to prior reports, includes a smaller portion of projects in the most significantly noise-impacted areas. Further, since the 2001 report, the number of airports planning eligible noise projects is down 16 percent, with about half the number of planned projects. Additionally, fewer airports are developing new noise compatibility programs and many of the 234 airports with such programs may be completed. For example, 102 of 137 airports with an NCP more than 10 years old received no noise grants since 2007, an indication that those airports may have completed all eligible projects in those plans. Finally, about a third of the people living in significantly noise-impacted areas reside near airports that have not completed, and may never complete, an NCP, a necessary step before an airport can use noise grants for residential noise insulation. This population, therefore, may never be reached by FAA’s grant program.

Why GAO Did This Study

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) predicts that air traffic in the United States will increase 20 percent by 2024. If not mitigated, the noise associated with these flights could significantly diminish the quality of life for communities surrounding airports and constrain an airport’s ability to expand. Over the last 30 years, Congress has provided billions of dollars in grants under the Airport Improvement Program to airports to reduce and mitigate significant noise exposure. FAA’s overall strategic noise goal is to reduce the population exposed to significant noise to fewer than 300,000 people nationwide.

At your request, GAO (1) described how airport noise exposure has changed, (2) evaluated noise grant results, and (3) assessed potential future demand for these grants. GAO analyzed FAA data on noise grants, planned projects, and population exposure and reviewed relevant literature. GAO also conducted interviews with relevant airport and FAA officials and industry representatives, as well as visited seven airports that have used noise grants, judgmentally selected based on size, location, and other factors.

Recommendations

GAO recommends that the Department of Transportation align its strategic goal for noise reduction with the results of the noise grant program and establish corresponding performance measures. The department provided technical comments and agreed to consider the recommendations.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Transportation To better ensure that federal investments effectively address the remaining airport noise problem and to more fully demonstrate the results of AIP noise grants, the Secretary of Transportation should direct FAA to establish a strategic noise reduction goal that aligns with the nature and extent of airport noise and targets the agency's noise grant program.
Closed – Not Implemented
GAO's report on the airport noise grant program was completed nearly 10 years ago, and this issue likely warrants another review. FAA continues to fund millions of dollars of noise projects annually and how these grants contribute to national goals remain an important topic. GAO has routinely reported that linking program performance to overall goals can provide a clear, direct understanding of how program results will lead to the achievement of goals. GAO continues to believe FAA should take a strategic approach to airport noise that includes setting goals for, and measuring the progress of, its noise grant program. However, given FAA's move to decouple AIP noise grants from the agency's overall goals, the deficiency we identified in 2012 is no longer relevant and GAO is closing these recommendations as not implemented.
Department of Transportation To better ensure that federal investments effectively address the remaining airport noise problem and to more fully demonstrate the results of AIP noise grants, the Secretary of Transportation should direct FAA to establish performance measures to assess progress toward this goal that better demonstrate the results of the program and provide Congress and FAA's program managers with information to gauge progress and make programmatic decisions.
Closed – Not Implemented
GAO's report on the airport noise grant program was completed nearly 10 years ago, and this issue likely warrants another review. FAA continues to fund millions of dollars of noise projects annually and how these grants contribute to national goals remain an important topic. GAO has routinely reported that linking program performance to overall goals can provide a clear, direct understanding of how program results will lead to the achievement of goals. GAO continues to believe FAA should take a strategic approach to airport noise that includes setting goals for, and measuring the progress of, its noise grant program. However, given FAA's move to decouple AIP noise grants from the agency's overall goals, the deficiency we identified in 2012 is no longer relevant and GAO is closing these recommendations as not implemented.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

AirportsGrant programsAirport noiseInsulationBeneficiariesAircraft acquisition programEligibility criteriaCommunitiesAviationAirport improvement program