KC-46 Tanker Aircraft:
Acquisition Plans Have Good Features but Contain Schedule Risk
GAO-12-366: Published: Mar 26, 2012. Publicly Released: Mar 26, 2012.
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Text:
What GAO Found
The KC-46 program has established its acquisition strategy for development and production, including total cost, procurement quantities, and key milestone dates. The program is using a $4.4 billion fixed-price incentive (firm target) development contract that provides contractor incentives to control costs and limits the governments liability for increased costs over a certain amount. While estimated development costs are currently $900 million higher than the February 2011 contract award amount, the governments share of these extra costs is limited to about $500 million. The program has identified key performance parameters, but has not yet fully implemented the metrics for tracking their achievement.
There is broad agreement that KC-46 schedule risk is a concern. In GAOs assessment, significant concurrency, or overlap, among development and production activities add risk to the program. The Air Force and contractor have assessed overall schedule risk as moderate, citing concerns about software and the ability to complete development flight testing on time. Further, the DODs chief testing official finds the testing schedule not executable as currently planned. While designing a new tanker using a modified commercial platform is not as technically challenging as a more revolutionary weapon system, the program still faces some technical risks, including technologies that have not yet been demonstrated during flight.
The KC-46 programs acquisition strategy provides a good framework for meeting GAOs knowledge-based best practices, and generally adheres to defense policy guidance and recent acquisition reform legislation. DOD waived the requirement for a preliminary design review before the program began system development and demonstration, but this design review is planned for March 2012. Although the programs three critical technologies have not yet achieved the level of maturity indicated in best practices, they have reached a level of maturity consistent with DOD policy. Given that the KC-46 is one of only a few major programs in recent years to use a fixed-price incentive contract and the importance of tanker replacement to national security, rigorous monitoring of the programs progress will be essential.
Why GAO Did This Study
Aerial refueling is essential to global U.S. military operations. The backbone of the nations tanker forcesthe KC-135 Stratotankeris over 50 years old on average with age-related problems and increasing support costs that could ground the fleet. Given this, the Air Force has initiated the $51.7 billion KC-46 program to start replacing the current fleet. Plans are to produce 18 tankers by 2017 and 179 aircraft through 2027. Other follow-on procurements are anticipated to replace all KC-135s.
The National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 requires GAO to annually review the KC-46 program through 2017. This report addresses (1) the programs acquisition strategy, including its contracting approach; (2) the major schedule and technical risks; and (3) the extent the programs acquisition strategy and documentation comply with policy, legislation, and best practices. To address these areas, GAO reviewed key documents on the programs contract and cost baseline. GAO discussed the major schedule and technical risks with program office officials and examined an independent technology readiness assessment. GAO also assessed the acquisition plan and required documentation to determine compliance with acquisition legislation, policy, and best practices.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends DOD leadership monitor the progress and outcomes of this contract to provide lessons learned for future acquisition programs, and the program fully implement metrics to track achievement of key performance parameters. DOD fully concurred.
For more information, contact Michael J. Sullivan at (202) 512-4841, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Comments: DOD compiled lessons learned during the source selection phase of the program. However, as of July 2019, the Department has not yet identified lessons learned during program implementation to evaluate cost, schedule and performance outcomes as we recommended. Program officials said they are collecting lessons learned, but will not report them until after the development contract is complete in 2021.
Recommendation: As one of only a few major acquisition programs to award a fixed-price incentive (firm target) development contract in recent years, evaluating performance and identifying lessons learned will be very illustrative and important to inform decision-makers and help guide and improve future defense acquisition programs. Therefore, the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics should closely monitor the cost, schedule, and performance outcomes of the KC-46 program to identify positive or negative lessons learned.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Office of the Secretary of Defense: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: The KC-46 program states that they have now implemented an approach to capture metrics for each of the program's Key Performance Parameters, including a process to measure and report the status of all Key Performance Parameters on a monthly basis.
Recommendation: To help ensure that progress toward achievement of the program's key performance parameters can be appropriately measured as development progresses toward production, the KC-46 program manager, as soon as possible, should fully implement sound metrics for each parameter.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense: Department of the Air Force