Nonprofit Sector:
Treatment and Reimbursement of Indirect Costs Vary among Grants, and Depend Significantly on Federal, State, and Local Government Practices
GAO-10-477: Published: May 18, 2010. Publicly Released: May 18, 2010.
Additional Materials:
- Highlights Page:
- Full Report:
- Accessible Text:
Contact:
(202) 512-6520
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Nonprofits are key partners in delivering federal services yet reportedly often struggle to cover their indirect costs (costs not readily identifiable with particular programs or projects). This raises concerns about fiscal strain on the sector. To provide information on nonprofits' indirect cost reimbursement, especially when funding flows through entities such as state and local governments, GAO was asked to review, for selected grants and nonprofits, (1) how indirect cost terminology and classification vary, (2) how indirect costs are reimbursed, and (3) if gaps occur between indirect costs incurred and reimbursed, steps taken to bridge gaps. GAO selected six Departments of Health and Human Services and Housing and Urban Development grants and 17 nonprofits in Louisiana, Maryland, and Wisconsin. GAO selected these agencies for their historical relationship with nonprofits. GAO reviewed policies and documents governing indirect costs and interviewed relevant officials. GAO also reviewed research on nonprofits' indirect costs.
Depending on the grant program, nonprofits may be reimbursed for indirect costs (generally costs such as rent or utilities), administrative costs (generally cost activities such as accounting or personnel), both, or neither. OMB officials said costs can be classified as either indirect or direct, and administrative cost activities are usually, but not always, classified as indirect costs. However, inconsistencies in the use and meaning of the terms indirect and administrative, and their relationship to each other, has made it difficult for state and local governments and nonprofits to classify costs consistently. This has resulted in varying interpretations of what activity costs are indirect versus administrative. As OMB guidance on cost principles for nonprofits recognizes (2 CFR Part 230), because nonprofit organizations have diverse characteristics and accounting practices, it is not possible to specify the types of costs that may be classified as indirect in all situations. This increases the challenges of administering federal grants and, in some cases, makes it difficult for recipients to determine those activities eligible for indirect cost reimbursement under a particular federal grant and those that are not. GAO found differences in the rate in which state and local governments reimburse nonprofits for indirect costs. These differences, including whether nonprofits are reimbursed at all, largely depend on the policies and practices of the state and local governments that award federal funds to nonprofits. Federal grants often provide wide latitude in setting cost reimbursement policies and practices, and some state and local governments do not reimburse these costs at all. Those that do can often choose the reimbursement rate. As a result, GAO found that variations in indirect cost reimbursement exist not only among different grants, but also within the same grant across different states. GAO found that nonprofits fund indirect costs with a variety of federal and nonfederal funding sources, and that when indirect cost reimbursement is less than the amount of indirect costs nonprofits determine they have incurred, most nonprofits GAO interviewed take steps to bridge the gap. They may reduce the population served or the scope of services offered, and may forgo or delay physical infrastructure and technology improvements and staffing needs. Because many nonprofits view cuts in clients served or services offered as unpalatable, they reported that they often compromise vital "back-office" functions, which over time can affect their ability to meet their missions. Further, nonprofits' strained resources limit their ability to build a financial safety net, which can create a precarious financial situation for them. Absent a sufficient safety net, nonprofits that experience delays in receiving their federal funding may be inhibited in their ability to bridge funding gaps. When funding is delayed, some nonprofits said they either borrow funds on a line of credit or use cash reserves to provide services and pay bills until their grant awards are received. Collectively, these issues place stress on the nonprofit sector, diminishing its ability to continue to effectively partner with the federal government to provide services to vulnerable populations.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: OMB has reached out to professional organizations to provide training to nonprofit organizations, state and local governments and federal agencies on the treatment and recovery of indirect costs. Specifically, OMB has requested that the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA), the National Grants Management Association (NGMA), and the Maryland Association of CPAs (MACPA) provide training on indirect costs and other grants management issues at their nonprofit conferences. OMB has participated in this type of training at an NGMA Grants Training Conference and a MACPA conference held in April 2011, and will also participate at the AICPA Nonprofit Conference in June 2011 and another NGMA Grants Training Conference in September 2011.
Recommendation: The Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) should bring together federal, state, and local governments, and nonprofit representatives to propose ways to clarify and improve understanding of how indirect costs should be treated, particularly for grants passed through state and local governments to nonprofits by clarifying the definitions of indirect costs and administrative costs and their relationship to each other.
Agency Affected: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: OMB has reached out to professional organizations to provide training to nonprofit organizations, state and local governments and federal agencies on the treatment and recovery of indirect costs. Specifically, OMB has requested that the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA), the National Grants Management Association (NGMA), and the Maryland Association of CPAs (MACPA) provide training on indirect costs and other grants management issues at their nonprofit conferences. OMB has participated in this type of training at an NGMA Grants Training Conference and a MACPA conference held in April 2011, and will also participate at the AICPA Nonprofit Conference in June 2011 and another NGMA Grants Training Conference in September 2011.
Recommendation: The Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) should bring together federal, state, and local governments, and nonprofit representatives to propose ways to clarify and improve understanding of how indirect costs should be treated, particularly for grants passed through state and local governments to nonprofits by considering ways to help nonprofits improve their understanding and ability to better capture, categorize, report, and recover indirect and administrative costs.
Agency Affected: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations
»
Feb 13, 2019
-
Internet Privacy:
Additional Federal Authority Could Enhance Consumer Protection and Provide FlexibilityGAO-19-52: Published: Jan 15, 2019. Publicly Released: Feb 13, 2019.
Jan 29, 2019
-
Indian Programs:
Interior Should Address Factors Hindering Tribal Administration of Federal ProgramsGAO-19-87: Published: Jan 3, 2019. Publicly Released: Jan 29, 2019.
Dec 20, 2018
-
Federal Building Security:
Actions Needed to Help Achieve Vision for Secure, Interoperable Physical Access ControlGAO-19-138: Published: Dec 20, 2018. Publicly Released: Dec 20, 2018.
Dec 19, 2018
-
Asbestos in GSA Buildings:
Improved Data Would Enhance OversightGAO-19-45R: Published: Nov 19, 2018. Publicly Released: Dec 19, 2018.
Dec 18, 2018
-
Buy American Act:
Actions Needed to Improve Exception and Waiver Reporting and Selected Agency GuidanceGAO-19-17: Published: Dec 18, 2018. Publicly Released: Dec 18, 2018.
Dec 10, 2018
-
2020 Census:
Additional Steps Needed to Finalize Readiness for Peak Field OperationsGAO-19-140: Published: Dec 10, 2018. Publicly Released: Dec 10, 2018.
Dec 4, 2018
-
Fraud Risk Management:
OMB Should Improve Guidelines and Working-Group Efforts to Support Agencies' Implementation of the Fraud Reduction and Data Analytics ActGAO-19-34: Published: Dec 4, 2018. Publicly Released: Dec 4, 2018.
Nov 16, 2018
-
Federal Personal Property:
GSA and VA Have Opportunities to Improve the Exchange Sale ProcessGAO-19-33: Published: Nov 16, 2018. Publicly Released: Nov 16, 2018.
Nov 5, 2018
-
Federal Real Property Asset Management:
Agencies Could Benefit from Additional Information on Leading PracticesGAO-19-57: Published: Nov 5, 2018. Publicly Released: Nov 5, 2018.
Oct 25, 2018
-
National Air and Space Museum:
Smithsonian's Efforts to Improve Reliability of Its Revitalization Project's Cost Estimate Are OngoingGAO-19-78: Published: Oct 25, 2018. Publicly Released: Oct 25, 2018.
Looking for more? Browse all our products here