[Protest of EPA Contract Award for Program Support Services]

B-270160.2: Apr 10, 1996

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contract award for program support services, contending that: (1) EPA improperly evaluated and downgraded its technical proposal; (2) EPA made an improper cost/technical tradeoff in selecting the awardee's higher-priced, technically-equal bid; (3) the awardee's proposed subcontractor presented an organizational conflict of interest; and (4) the award was invalid, since EPA needed to amend the solicitation because its requirements had changed. GAO held that: (1) EPA reasonably evaluated and downgraded the protester's bid, since its bid did not contain sufficient information and was generally disorganized; (2) EPA performed a proper cost/technical tradeoff in selecting the awardee's higher-priced, technically superior bid; (3) the awardee's use of the subcontractor did not pose a conflict of interest, since it was capable of performing the required work without involving the subcontractor's staff; and (4) the protester was not prejudiced by EPA failure to amend the solicitation. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Oct 29, 2020

Oct 28, 2020

Oct 27, 2020

  • Silver Investments, Inc.
    We dismiss the protest as untimely because it was filed more than 10 days after the protester knew, or should have known, the basis for its protest.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here