[Protests of Army Solicitations for Construction]
B-254006,B-254093,B-254099,B-254100,B-254101,B-254102,B-254103,B
Published: Nov 16, 1993. Publicly Released: Nov 16, 1993.
Skip to Highlights
Highlights
A firm protested several Army solicitations for construction, contending that the procurements should have been set aside for small disadvantaged businesses (SDB). GAO held that the Army reasonably determined: (1) that it would not receive bids from at least two responsible SDB; and (2) not to set aside the procurement. Accordingly, the protests were denied.
Office of Public Affairs
Topics
Army procurementBid protestsBidder responsibilityConstruction contractsDefense economic analysisFair market valueSmall business set-asidesProcurementSolicitationsConstructionU.S. ArmyBid proposalsProtestsDisadvantaged businessIntellectual property rightsSet-asides