A firm protested the Army's partial termination of its contract and subsequent contract award for helicopter tip cap assemblies, contending that the Army improperly determined in a previous protest that it improperly excluded the instant awardee from the competitive range. GAO held that it would not review an affirmative responsibility determination, unless the protester could provide evidence of...

Is dismissed. Award was to be made to the responsive and responsible offeror whose proposal was evaluated as the lowest cost to the government. Composite was awarded the contract after the Army determined Sikorsky. Was nonresponsible. Composite objects to the corrective action undertaken by the Army asserting that it was unjustified. Does not raise a basis for protest for which we will grant relie...