[Request for Reconsideration of Dismissed Protests of Army Solicitation for Terminals]

B-229854.2,B-229856.2,B-229857.2,B-229858.2: Apr 20, 1988

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm requested reconsideration of its dismissed protests against an Army solicitation for terminals. GAO had held that the protester untimely filed its protests after bid opening. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that GAO should consider the protests under the significant-issue exception to its timeliness rules. GAO would not consider the protests, since it had previously addressed the issues the protester raised. Accordingly, the dismissals were affirmed.

Mar 22, 2018

Mar 20, 2018

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

  • Interoperability Clearinghouse
    We dismiss the protest because the protester, a not-for-profit entity, is not an interested party to challenge this sole-source award to an Alaska Native Corporation under the Small Business Administration's (SBA) 8(a) program.

Looking for more? Browse all our products here