[Request for Reconsideration of Decision Concerning Protest of DECCO Contract Award]

A firm requested reconsideration of its protest against a Defense Commercial Communications Office (DECCO) contract award to another firm. GAO had held that the protester: (1) was not prejudiced when DECCO changed the service delivery dates; and (2) failed to show that it would have reduced its bid price had it known of the change. In its request for reconsideration, the protester contended that GAO: (1) incorrectly decided that it was not prejudiced by the change; and (2) did not address its allegation that DECCO failed to promptly inform it of the contract award. GAO held that: (1) the protester did not show any legal or factual errors in the prior decision; and (2) since the protest was without merit, the protester was not prejudiced by the delay in award notification. Accordingly, the request for reconsideration was denied.