[Protest of DLA Cancellation of IFB for Sliding Door Tracks]

B-221894,B-222046,B-222960: Jun 4, 1986

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested the Defense Logistics Agency's (DLA) cancellation of a solicitation and subsequent resolicitation for helicopter parts, contending that: (1) DLA improperly cancelled the solicitation after contacting the parts manufacturer, which did not bid, and determining that, had it bid, its price might have been lower; and (2) DLA should solicit for the parts using a request for proposals (RFP) rather than a request for quotations (RFQ). The protester also claimed reimbursement for its bid and protest preparation costs. GAO held that: (1) DLA improperly consulted the parts manufacturer about its potential bid price; (2) the difference in the protester's bid price and the price the manufacturer allegedly would have bid was small and consisted mostly of a difference in transportation costs that DLA ignored; (3) DLA should have used an RFP to solicit for the parts; (4) DLA should cancel the resolicitation and award the protester a contract, if otherwise appropriate; and (5) it would not allow the protester's claim for bid and protest preparation costs because it was recommending that DLA award the protester a contract. Accordingly, the protest was sustained and the claim was denied.

Mar 19, 2018

  • Ampcus, Inc.
    We deny the protest.
  • AMAR Health IT, LLC
    We dismiss the protest because our Office does not have jurisdiction to entertain protests of task orders issued under civilian agency multiple-award, indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contracts that are valued at less than $10 million.
  • Centurum, Inc.--Costs
    We grant the request.

Mar 15, 2018

  • ORBIS Sibro, Inc.
    We sustain the protest in part and deny it in part.

Mar 14, 2018

Mar 13, 2018

Mar 12, 2018

Looking for more? Browse all our products here