Skip to main content

[Protest of Air Force Contract Award for Test and Evaluation Analysis and Long-Range Planning]

B-258198,B-258198.2,B-258198.3 Published: Dec 27, 1994. Publicly Released: Dec 27, 1994.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

A firm protested an Air Force contract award for test and evaluation analysis and long-range planning, contending that the Air Force: (1) unreasonably evaluated the bids; and (2) failed to hold discussions before making award. GAO held that the: (1) Air Force reasonably adjusted the protester's labor and overhead costs upward to reflect a more realistic escalation rate, since the protester failed to justify its proposed labor rate; (2) Air Force reasonably determined that the awardee's bid contained a clerical error which could be corrected after award; (3) solicitation did not prohibit uncompensated overtime; and (4) Air Force was not required to hold discussions, since the solicitation provided for award without discussions. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

View Decision

B-214777, APR 13, 1984

DIGEST: PROTEST IS DISMISSED WHERE THE MATERIAL ISSUES ARE BEFORE A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION, JUDICIAL RELIEF PENDING A DECISION BY THIS OFFICE HAS NOT BEEN REQUESTED, AND THE COURT HAS NOT EXPRESSED INTEREST IN RECEIVING GAO'S VIEWS.

NUMAX ELECTRONICS INCORPORATED:

NUMAX ELECTRONICS INCORPORATED (NUMAX) PROTESTS AN ALLEGED IMPROPER SOLE- SOURCE NEGOTIATION AND AWARD OF AN OPTION QUANTITY TO ANOTHER COMPANY UNDER CONTRACT NO. DAAB07-82-C-C033, ISSUED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY.

WE WILL NOT CONSIDER THE PROTEST.

NUMAX HAS FILED A SUIT CONCERNING THIS AWARD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (CIVIL ACTION NO. 84-0914) SEEKING PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF. THE COURT'S RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUES BEFORE IT WILL CONTROL THE RESOLUTION OF THE PROTEST AS THE ISSUES ARE THE SAME. IT IS OUR POLICY NOT TO DECIDE PROTESTS WHERE THE MATERIAL ISSUES ARE BEFORE A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION UNLESS THE COURT REQUESTS, EXPECTS OR OTHERWISE EXPRESSES AN INTEREST IN RECEIVING OUR VIEWS. 4 C.F.R. SEC. 21.10 (1983). PLAINTIFF NUMAX HAS NOT REQUESTED JUDICIAL RELIEF PENDING A DECISION BY THIS OFFICE, AND THE COURT HAS NOT INDICATED AN INTEREST IN OUR DECISION.

THE PROTEST IS DISMISSED. HARRIS DATA COMMUNICATIONS, INC., B-210521, MARCH 22, 1983, 83-1 CPD 291.

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Air Force procurementBid evaluation protestsContract award protestsContract negotiationsCost analysisPlanningPrice adjustmentsQuestionable procurement chargesService contractsTestingSolicitationsU.S. Air Force