[Protest of EPA Contract Award for Technical Support]

B-253506: Sep 16, 1993

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contract award for technical support services, contending that EPA: (1) unreasonably evaluated the awardee's bid; (2) performed an unreasonable cost-technical tradeoff, and failed to follow the solicitation's evaluation criteria; and (3) unreasonably determined that the awardee was a responsible bidder. GAO held that: (1) EPA reasonably evaluated the awardee's bid; (2) EPA reasonably determined that the protester's technical superiority did not justify its high bid; (3) the erroneous description of the awardee's proposed direct labor costs in the EPA selection documentation was minor and did not affect its cost-technical tradeoff decision; and (4) there was no basis to review the EPA affirmative responsibility determination. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Jan 23, 2020

Jan 21, 2020

Looking for more? Browse all our products here