[Protest of Army Contract Award for FMS Equipment, Tools, and Services]

B-252143: Jun 2, 1993

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

A firm protested an Army contract award for foreign military sales (FMS) equipment, tools, and services, contending that the: (1) awardee's product did not meet solicitation specifications; (2) Army improperly engaged in technical levelling and provided the awardee an opportunity to correct weaknesses in its bid; and (3) awardee offered two products of foreign origin that should have been subject to a price penalty. GAO held that: (1) the awardee's descriptive literature indicated that its products complied with solicitation specification; (2) the Army reasonably determined that the awardee's products were acceptable; (3) the Army did not provide the awardee an opportunity to correct weaknesses in its bid; (4) discussions with the awardee did not amount to technical levelling; and (5) the Army reasonably relied on the awardee's domestic end product certification, since there was no evidence to question its products' origin. Accordingly, the protest was denied.

Nov 14, 2019

Nov 13, 2019

Nov 7, 2019

Nov 5, 2019

Nov 1, 2019

Looking for more? Browse all our products here