[Protest of Army Contract Award for Construction]

A firm protested any Army contract award for construction, contending that the: (1) solicitation requirements restricted its ability to compete; and (2) Army should resolicit and allow prospective offerers to furnish their own products. GAO held that the protester was not sufficiently interested to protest, since it was not a prospective offerer but only a potential subcontractor. Accordingly, the protest was dismissed.