GAO has issued the 2019 High Risk List, a list of programs and operations that are ‘high risk’ due to their vulnerabilities to fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement, or that need transformation. The list is issued every 2 years at the start of each new session of Congress and has led to more than $350 billion in financial benefits to the federal government in the past 13 years.
In our latest update, the rankings for more than half of the over 30 areas on the list remained largely unchanged with three regressing. Ratings for seven areas improved, two to the point of coming off the list.
We also added VA Acquisition Management to the list after identifying seven VA contracting challenges at the Department of Veterans Affairs. VA has one of the most significant acquisition functions in the federal government, in costs and numbers of contracts.
In 1990, we began a program to report on government operations that we identified as “high risk.” Since then, generally coinciding with the start of each new Congress, we have reported on the status of progress to address high risk areas and update the High Risk List.
Overall, our High Risk List has served to identify and help resolve serious weaknesses in areas that involve substantial resources and provide critical services to the public.
Since our program began, the government has taken high-risk problems seriously and has made long needed progress toward correcting them.
In a number of cases, progress has been sufficient for us to remove the High Risk designation.
Comptroller General Testifies to the U.S. House on GAO’s 2019 High Risk List
VIDEO: Comptroller General Testifies to U.S. House on GAO's 2019 High Risk List Update
Comptroller General Testifies to the U.S. Senate on GAO’s 2019 High Risk List
VIDEO: Comptroller General Testifies to U.S. Senate on GAO's 2019 High Risk List Update
The key elements needed to make progress in High Risk areas are top-level attention by the administration and agency leaders grounded in the five criteria for removal from the High Risk List, as well as any needed congressional action. Here are the five criteria:
Leadership Commitment. Demonstrated strong commitment and top leadership support.
Capacity. Agency has the capacity (i.e., people and resources) to resolve the risk(s).
Action Plan. A corrective action plan exists that defines the root cause, solutions, and provides for substantially completing corrective measures including steps necessary to implement solutions we recommended.
Monitoring. A program has been instituted to monitor and independently validate the effectiveness and sustainability of corrective measures.
Demonstrated Progress. Ability to demonstrate progress in implementing corrective measures and resolving the high-risk area.
In 2015, GAO began illustrating progress in high risk areas using a five-pointed star. The star visibly indicates whether each of the five criteria have been met, partially met, or not met for that high risk area.
In 2015, GAO introduced a rating system for tracking progress in High Risk areas. See how GAO depicts each area’s rating with its five-pointed star tool.