Skip to main content

Designing and Implementing Federal User Fees

Posted on October 27, 2015

Navigating the federal budget can stump even the savviest of wonks. One of the things that complicates federal budgeting is the variety of ways the federal government collects money. Today’s WatchBlog examines one significant, if lesser known, source of federal revenue: user fees.

A la carte services

The government charges user fees for goods and services which generally have special benefits that are above and beyond what is normally provided to the public. For example, you may have paid a fee to enter a national park. Importers may pay fees for agricultural quarantine inspections. Or an inventor may pay for her patent application.

These fees add up: user fees amounted to more than $300 billion in fiscal year 2014, according to the President’s budget.

Splitting the tab

User fees are meant to promote fairness and economic efficiency by having those who benefit from particular government goods and services pay for them. Which is why, in some cases, user fees cover the entire cost of the activities.

However, when something benefits both a particular group and the general public, user fees may cover only a portion of the cost. For example, pharmaceutical manufacturers pay a fee for FDA to review their prescription drug applications. The fees cover part of the cost of the reviews, and general revenues cover the rest because the public also benefits from them.

GAO-08-386SP(Excerpted from GAO-08-386SP)

Bang for the buck

Well-designed user fees can help pay for programs while reducing taxpayer burden—but they also require thoughtful design. For example, if a fee doesn’t cover the entire cost of a program, how should the costs be split? To help policymakers with these and other questions, we issued a user fee design guide.

In September, we issued a report on regulatory user fees. These are fees businesses and individuals pay related to federal government regulations. For example, operators of a nuclear power plant may pay fees to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to cover some costs associated with regulating the industry.

GAO-15-718(Excerpted from GAO-15-718)

Our report addresses issues specific to regulatory user fees. For example, one issue with regulatory fees is whether an agency ever appears to act in ways that benefit a regulated business—rather than the public interest—because of the fees that business pays to the agency. In this case, one option is to separate the staff responsible for reviewing businesses from the staff who are collecting the fees.


GAO Contacts

Susan J. Irving
Susan J. Irving
Senior Advisor

Related Products

About Watchblog

GAO's mission is to provide Congress with fact-based, nonpartisan information that can help improve federal government performance and ensure accountability for the benefit of the American people. GAO launched its WatchBlog in January, 2014, as part of its continuing effort to reach its audiences—Congress and the American people—where they are currently looking for information.

The blog format allows GAO to provide a little more context about its work than it can offer on its other social media platforms. Posts will tie GAO work to current events and the news; show how GAO’s work is affecting agencies or legislation; highlight reports, testimonies, and issue areas where GAO does work; and provide information about GAO itself, among other things.

Please send any feedback on GAO's WatchBlog to