Skip to Highlights

GAO discussed its investigation of an Army procuring officer's apparent favoritism toward a contractor. GAO noted that: (1) the officer awarded the firm an interim contract for a major research initiative; (2) the officer invited the interim contractor, but no other potential bidders, to a meeting to plan the permanent contract's acquisition strategy; (3) the Army distributed 74 solicitations to potential bidders but received only the interim contractor's bid, and awarded it the permanent contract; (4) an Army criminal investigation concluded that the contractor received acquisition information in violation of Army regulations; (5) the procuring activity concluded that it had not violated regulations, since there was no evidence that the information provided the contractor with a competitive advantage; (6) the procuring officer retired 1 month after receiving a written reprimand from the Army; and (7) procuring activity, as a result of the investigation, issued detailed guidance regarding the release of acquisition information.